Jump to content

Game 39

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sepp Blatter, when president of FIFA, football's world governing body, strongly opposed the "game 39" proposal.

"Game 39" or the international round was a proposed extra round of matches in the Premier League to be played at neutral venues outside England. The top football league in England, the Premier League, is played on a double round robin basis, where each of the 20 teams in the league plays each of the other 19 teams home and away, giving a total of 380 games, 38 for each team. The international round was proposed at a meeting of the 20 Premier League clubs on 7 February 2008, with a view to being introduced for the 2010–11 season, when a new television broadcasting rights contract would be in place. The proposed start date was later put back to 2013–14. The proposal was reportedly endorsed by the chairmen of a number of Premier League clubs.

Game 39 resulted in opposition from several club managers. The proposal also met with strong condemnation from supporters' organisations, who saw it as solely motivated by money to the detriment of fans. Sepp Blatter, president of the sport's global governing body at that time, expressed a negative opinion of the proposal and stated that it could affect England's bid to host the 2018 World Cup, and the football authorities in a number of the areas suggested as venues for the matches were also opposed. In May 2010, the Premier League said that it was no longer actively considering game 39,[1] but in October 2014 it was said to be re-considering the idea.[2]

Proposal

[edit]

The Premier League, the top-level football league in England, contains 20 member clubs, with each playing the others once at home and once away for a total of 38 games per season.[3] The proposal envisaged each team playing one further match, a total of ten extra matches, over one weekend in January.[3] Two matches would be played in each of five cities, one each on Saturday and Sunday.[3] Cities would bid for the right to stage matches, but would not be able to specify which teams would be involved.[3] The matches would be held at staggered start times, with venues in different time zones, making it possible in theory to watch live television coverage of all ten.[3] There are conflicting reports about whether the draw for the extra fixtures would be seeded or not.[4]

The week prior to the international round would be free of matches, to allow for travel and acclimatisation.[3] The week after the international round would see each team face one of the teams which had played at the same foreign venue, to avoid any disadvantage for teams with a longer round-trip.[4] Venues suggested for international-round matches were Australia, East Asia, Southeast Asia, the Gulf States, and North America.[3] All are wealthy regions where interest in English football is strong relative to the level of the domestic game. Venues would have warm, predictable weather, unlike England in January.[3]

Premier League chief executive Richard Scudamore initially said there would not be more than one international round per season, stating "I stress that on my watch, there will be no 40th game. The value [of a 39th game] is in its uniqueness, in that festival weekend, so there's no point in diluting it".[5] Subsequently, he suggested the initial plan would last six to ten years and might be altered.[6]

Development

[edit]

Foreshadowing the plan were the Premier League Asia Trophy, started in 2003, and the NFL International Series American football game played at Wembley Stadium in London in 2007.[3] Rod Eddington pitched the idea of an international round to the Premier League in autumn 2007.[7] Eddington was chairman of Victorian Major Events Company and a friend of Rupert Murdoch, owner of Sky Sports and other networks with broadcasting rights to the Premier League.[7] He suggested his home city of Melbourne as an inaugural host city.[citation needed] A presentation to the Premier League's audit-and-remuneration committee was made two weeks before the public announcement.[8] An initial business plan predicted extra earnings from the international round of between £40 million and £80 million per year.[3]

The Premier League put in place a working party to negotiate with the various concerned parties.[4] They initially stated that, to proceed with the plan, it needed the support only of the Football Association (FA) and the football governing bodies of the countries of the host cities.[6] It attempted to secure the support of the FA for the proposal by promising to rearrange club fixtures for better convenience to players called up to the England team.[5] Scudamore planned to meet officials from the sport's global governing body FIFA, before its executive committee meeting in Zürich on 14 March 2008.[6] On 27 February, after several weeks of mostly negative reaction, Scudamore agreed with Jérôme Valcke, general secretary of FIFA, that the meeting would be postponed indefinitely.[9] The Premier League presented this as an opportunity to rethink its proposals, and said that it would not proceed without FIFA approval.[9]

In May 2008, Scudamore told BBC Radio 5 Live that the proposal was "not over", but that the League would "come up with something that ticks more boxes" by January 2009.[10] In August 2008, Scudamore said that the League had "a whole host of ideas, some more radical than others, but none quite as radical as the original concept".[11] In October 2008, he said Game 39 was still a possibility,[12] although the timing of TV contracts meant it would be in the 2013–14 season at the earliest.[13] An agreement in December 2008 between the Premier League and the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) was linked to Game 39 by the media.[14]

Reactions

[edit]

In England

[edit]
David Gold, then chairman of Birmingham City, endorsed the idea.

David Gold, chairman of Birmingham City, endorsed the plan in part because the larger clubs have in any case already been exploiting foreign markets, with pre-season and even mid-season tours; Game 39 would distribute its revenue among all the clubs.[15] On 15 February, Liverpool F.C. chief executive Rick Parry stated that the proposal had "never been on Liverpool's club agenda" and acknowledged the concern of the club's fans and manager.[16] Paul Hayward, writing in The Guardian, said that the proposal would destroy the balance of the home-and-away round-robin league.[17] The Football Supporters' Federation (FSF) condemned the proposal as being motivated by money, and dubbed it "Gam£39".[15] In March 2008, FSF ended its campaign of opposition by declaring the proposal "effectively dead".[18] Many die-hard fans who pride themselves on travelling to all their teams' away matches would have been unable to travel abroad for "Game 39".[5] On the other hand, exotic foreign venues would potentially be more appealing destinations for fans than a mundane English city.[4] Managers of Premier League clubs reported to be opposed to or sceptical of the plans included Steve Bruce,[15] Roy Hodgson,[15] Gareth Southgate,[15] and Rafael Benítez.[19] Alex Ferguson criticised the club owners for lack of consultation with managers.[20] Arsène Wenger,[19][20][21] Roy Keane,[20] Kevin Keegan,[20] and Avram Grant[21] supported the proposal. 'Game 39' was also defended as a move to head off plans for a World League involving only elite clubs such as those formerly in the G-14 group.[4]

Andy Burnham, the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, cautioned that football should "not forget its roots".[15] Gordon Taylor of the Professional Footballers' Association expressed concern about increased pressure on players.[20] The FA on 15 February expressed "serious reservations" that the proposal might damage England's bid to host the 2018 World Cup.[19][22] An FA board meeting on 21 February concluded that the plan was "unsustainable in its current format".[23]

Elsewhere

[edit]

The proposal was condemned by Sepp Blatter, president of FIFA, who said it brought the game into disrepute and would adversely affect England's bid for the 2018 World Cup.[21] He also said "Football cannot be like the Harlem Globetrotters or a circus".[24] Michel Platini of the sport's European governing body, UEFA, called it a "nonsense idea".[20] Strong reservations were expressed by the Korean FA, and the Japanese FA opposed the plan.[25] Middle-eastern FAs were reportedly more positive.[25] In February 2008 AFC president Mohammed Bin Hammam said he would "vote strongly against" the proposal;[7] in June he was prepared to reconsider if the plan had FA support;[26] in October he said he would welcome it if the League shared revenue with the AFC.[12][27] The Hong Kong FA said it was "very interested" in hosting games.[28] Football Federation Australia said it would oppose it if it impacted its own A-League.[7] Ivan Gazidis, deputy commissioner of Major League Soccer (MLS) in the United States, said that MLS would welcome the plan if it had FIFA approval.[29] Sunil Gulati, the president of the US Soccer Federation, said the USSF would be guided by FIFA about approving any matches.[30]

Aftermath

[edit]

Since 2013, Relevent Sports has run the International Champions Cup, a series of summer matches between teams from the Premier League and other top European sides, held in overseas markets including Asia and North America. In August 2018, Relevent announced a partnership with La Liga under which a regular-season fixture would be staged in the United States.[31] The proposal was compared to Game 39 in The Guardian by Ed Aarons, who speculated both that opposition from Spanish fans might stop Relevant's plan, and that Relevent might seek a similar arrangement with the Premier League.[32] The Royal Spanish Football Federation has held its Supercopa abroad since 2018, but prevents La Liga matches taking place outside Spain.[33] In 2019, US Soccer refused to sanction foreign league fixtures on U.S. territory, in line with a 2018 FIFA policy. Relevent sued under the Sherman Antitrust Act and in 2024 FIFA agreed to consider changing its policy.[34]

In September 2021, the Premier League told Sky Sports "there are no plans to extend the Premier League season to 39 games and play matches abroad", but there were initial proposals to "make pre-season matches more competitive, whilst also potentially opening up lucrative new international markets".[35] In 2023 Phil Murphy, the governor of New Jersey and a 2026 World Cup executive, said he "would love to think" Premier League matches would be played in his state but "the clubs have not been wild about" the idea.[36] Premier League CEO Richard Masters said after an April 2024 meeting of European Leagues, "The door looks ajar potentially in America anyway but it’s not one of our current plans, it really isn’t."[37] In response the Football Supporters' Association (FSA, successor to the FSF) promised to oppose any such move.[38]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Premier League rules out revival of 39th-game proposal". The Guardian. 9 May 2010. Retrieved 31 January 2013.
  2. ^ Gibson, Owen (7 October 2014). "Premier League to look again at playing competitive matches abroad". The Guardian. Retrieved 25 October 2014.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Bond, David (8 February 2008). "Premier League to embark on world tour". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 10 February 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2008.
  4. ^ a b c d e Winter, Henry (12 February 2008). "Richard Scudamore signals his intent for future". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 18 February 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2008.
  5. ^ a b c Winter, Henry (8 February 2008). "Premier League must not alienate ordinary fans". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 10 February 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2008.
  6. ^ a b c Winter, Henry (11 February 2008). "Richard Scudamore reneges on foreign fixtures". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 12 February 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2008.
  7. ^ a b c d Bond, David (14 February 2008). "Murdoch man behind League's global plan". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 17 February 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2008.
  8. ^ Scott, Matt (22 February 2008). "Time for Scuby to admit his own shortcomings". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 February 2008.
  9. ^ a b Kelso, Paul (27 February 2008). "Scudamore forced to climb down over Game 39". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 February 2008.
  10. ^ "Scudamore – 39th game idea 'not over'". ESPNsoccernet. 11 May 2008. Archived from the original on 25 May 2011. Retrieved 3 June 2008.
  11. ^ Bascombe, Chris (17 August 2008). "Game 39 on hold". News of the World.
  12. ^ a b Maher, Linda (12 October 2008). "Credit crunch helps put 'Game 39' back on the agenda". Sunday Business Post. Retrieved 14 October 2009.[permanent dead link‍]
  13. ^ Kelso, Paul (10 October 2008). "Five-year wait for Game 39; Premier League run out of time to negotiate TV deal for international round". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 11 October 2008. Retrieved 14 October 2009.
  14. ^ "Premier League agrees Asia link". BBC. 12 December 2008. Retrieved 14 October 2009.
  15. ^ a b c d e f Wilson, Jeremy (8 February 2008). "Premier League money-driven, say angry fans". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 10 February 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2008.
  16. ^ "Parry: Game 39 not 'On Liverpool's agenda'". ESPNsoccernet. 15 February 2008. Archived from the original on 25 May 2011. Retrieved 17 February 2008.
  17. ^ Hayward, Paul (20 May 2009). "Foul play: The seven deadly sins of football: Day five: Gluttony: The Premier League and Game 39: England, 2008". The Guardian. Retrieved 14 October 2009.
  18. ^ "End of Game 39". Football Supporters' Federation. Retrieved 3 June 2008.
  19. ^ a b c "FA concerned over top-flight plan". BBC. 15 February 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2008.
  20. ^ a b c d e f "Platini scorns global games plan". BBC. 9 February 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2008.
  21. ^ a b c "Wenger hits out at Blatter over 'Game 39'". The Daily Telegraph. 15 February 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2008.[dead link‍]
  22. ^ Kelso, Paul (16 February 2008). "Nervous FA rules Game 39 a step too far: Potentially fatal blow to Premier League's plan: Barwick not willing to risk damage to World Cup bid". The Guardian. Retrieved 17 February 2008.
  23. ^ Nathanson, Patrick (21 February 2008). "FA oppose Premier League's 39th step". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 22 February 2008.[dead link‍]
  24. ^ "Wenger hits out at Blatter over 'Game 39'(page 2)". The Daily Telegraph. 15 February 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2008.[dead link‍]
  25. ^ a b Ashdown, John; news agencies (12 February 2008). "Asian Football Confederation rejects global proposals: 'It is not a good idea to organise domestic leagues in territories other than their own'". The Guardian. Retrieved 17 February 2008.
  26. ^ "Game 39 back on agenda after head of Asian football's U-turn". The Daily Telegraph. 21 June 2008. Archived from the original on 5 May 2013. Retrieved 14 October 2009.
  27. ^ Conn, David (12 October 2008). "Yes from Asia puts Game 39 back on menu". The Guardian. Retrieved 14 October 2009.
  28. ^ "Wenger hits out at Blatter over 'Game 39' (page 3)". The Daily Telegraph. 15 February 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2008.[dead link‍]
  29. ^ "MLS keen to be involved: Deputy commissioner awaits Fifa verification". Sky Sports. 10 February 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2008.
  30. ^ Harris, Nick (12 February 2008). "America deals blow to Scudamore's global plan". The Independent. Retrieved 17 February 2008.
  31. ^ "La Liga set to stage match in US as battle to match Premier League grows". The Guardian. Associated Press. 16 August 2018. Retrieved 17 August 2018.
  32. ^ Aarons, Ed (16 August 2018). "Could La Liga's US venture spark a Premier export?". The Guardian. Retrieved 17 August 2018.
  33. ^
  34. ^ "Fifa court deal could open way for European league matches in US". The Guardian. Associated Press. 9 April 2024.
  35. ^ "Premier League: No plans to play matches abroad or extend season to 39 games". Sky Sports. 27 September 2021. Retrieved 27 September 2021.
  36. ^ Jackson, Jamie (25 July 2023). "World Cup executive feels Premier League could stage games in the US". The Guardian. Retrieved 26 July 2023.
  37. ^ Burrows, Tom (26 April 2024). "Premier League CEO Richard Masters slams FIFA over lack of consultation on Club World Cup expansion". The Athletic.
  38. ^ "Fans' body pledges 'studs to the knee' response if Game 39 plans are revived". The Guardian. Press Association. 30 April 2024.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Game_39&oldid=1257412096"