File talk:Green Wing (Series 1).ogg
Spoken article quality assessment
[edit]Version reviewed: As at 27 March 2008
Technical quality: High
- Overall very clear.
- Audio level is slightly too low, I think. I had to turn up the volume quite a lot, which would be a very uncomfortable level for any other audio.
- Some slight edit "clicks" occur frequently, but overall not too distracting, and audio level remains consistent between each.
Clarity: High
- A very pleasant voice and accent, though very "soft" - this may account for the low audio level, and perhaps should be compensated for in the processing.
- Pacing is good, and very easy to understand, though the soft voice trails off (too much?) at the ends of a lot of sentences.
- Could do with a little more inflection.
Accuracy: High
- Excellent treatment of the infobox and very competently dealt with the large table.
- Mis-pronunciation of Rose d'Or (both occurrences), though some might say that it is an "understandable" error for a non-French speaker. However, I would argue that the word is not yet in such common usage by English speakers that anglicisation is acceptable. For info, it should be Rose "door", not Rose "dee-or".
Disclaimer present.
Notes: {{{notes}}}
Help with recording issues can be obtained under "Recording assistance" here.
Information on the assessment procedure can be found on the spoken article assessment page.
Reviewed by:Maedin (talk) 18:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC)