File talk:2011 War On Libya Belligerents.svg

Greenland

As Greenland is a non-sovereign territory of Denmark, it should be colored blue on the map. -Kudzu1 (talk) 09:24, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sweden & Bulgaria

They have joined in enforcement...--Yalens (talk) 14:14, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hungary

Why is Hungary Blue? We are not sending any fighting units to that region. (AFAIK)

Or just because we are NATO members?

--Csendesmark (talk) 16:58, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we should have NATO members which are not sending troops (Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic, etc...) colored until we learn that they send troops....--Yalens (talk) 14:12, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Let's only mark the countries that are doing a military contribution with own troops. 80.216.160.67 (talk) 09:50, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Or maybe we can color NATO members with Blue, as the main NATO color. Color Red the attacking countries, and color Orange Attacking & NATO members. --Csendesmark (talk) 13:12, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I have worked up a map at home that shows other NATO countries as well as other countries lending vocal support to the mission in a lighter blue... also, countries that opposed the mission were colored various shades of yellow, orange or red (red means support to Gaddafi, either rhetorical, diplomatic or both; orange is anti-operation; yellow is condemning Gaddafi's government but switching to condemning the West after the operation...)... That might be a bit complicated though (also, I drew in Kosovo). --Yalens (talk) 14:25, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan

Now that Jordan has sent fighter jets, to be based out of Europe, to help enforce the resolution by providing logistical assistance and escorting transports on humanitarian missions, I think Jordan should be colored blue on the map. They may not be part of enforcing the no-fly zone or the naval blockade, but they have committed forces for the overall operation. -Kudzu1 (talk) 23:38, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Albania

You might as well put it in. --Yalens (talk) 17:44, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On what grounds? -Kudzu1 (talk) 00:40, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]