Jump to content

Expert wizard amendment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wizard hat similar to that required by the proposed amendment, but lacking lightning bolts

The expert wizard amendment was a proposed amendment by New Mexico state senator Duncan Scott, which would require psychologists and psychiatrists to dress up as wizards when they were in court proceedings providing expert testimony regarding a defendant's competency.[1] The amendment, proposed in 1995, passed New Mexico's Senate unanimously.[2] Scott revealed the amendment was satirical prior to a vote in New Mexico House of Representatives following which it was removed and thus never signed into law.

Scott said that he crafted the amendment because he felt that there were an excessive number of mental health practitioners acting as expert witnesses.[2]

Text of the amendment

[edit]

The full text of the amendment was,

When a psychologist or psychiatrist testifies during a defendant's competency hearing, the psychologist or psychiatrist shall wear a cone-shaped hat that is not less than two feet tall. The surface of the hat shall be imprinted with stars and lightning bolts. Additionally, a psychologist or psychiatrist shall be required to don a white beard that is not less than 18 inches in length and shall punctuate crucial elements of his testimony by stabbing the air with a wand. Whenever a psychologist or psychiatrist provides expert testimony regarding a defendant's competency, the bailiff shall contemporaneously dim the courtroom lights and administer two strikes to a Chinese gong.[3]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Lamar, Cyriaque. "In 1995, New Mexico voted on a bill requiring psychologists to dress as wizards". Gizmodo. Retrieved 13 February 2020.
  2. ^ a b "Odd Law Alert: New Mexico Expert Wizard Amendment". University of Cincinnati Law Review. 25 May 2018. Retrieved 13 February 2020.
  3. ^ Oswald, Mark (March 6, 1995). "Capitol Chronicle". The New Mexican. p. 7.