Electronic pollbook
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (December 2009) |
| Part of a series on |
| Election technology |
|---|
| Technology |
| Terminology |
|
| Testing |
| Manufacturers |
| Related aspects |
An electronic pollbook, also known as an e-pollbook, is typically either hardware, software or a combination of the two that allows election officials to review and/or maintain voter register information for an election, but does not actually count votes.[1] This software or hardware is used in place of paper-based pollbooks, which are typically three-ring binders. Often, the functions of an e-pollbook include voter lookup, verification, identification, precinct assignment, ballot assignment, voter history update and other functions such as name change, address change and/or redirecting voters to correct voting location.
When voters have a choice of multiple vote centers where they may vote, e-pollbooks communicating over the internet can prevent a voter from voting more than once.[2]
Where e-pollbooks are deployed, they have consolidated broad data (from entire city, county and/or federated state) into usable information at a polling place and have replaced a paper-based system or complemented the paper processes. This consolidation has replaced or supplemented a manual process, usually a telephone call, from a precinct back to the local or regional board of elections. Normally, the information handled by an e-pollbook is public information that can be found in public or online.
More jurisdictions are adopting electronic pollbooks in place of paper-based pollbooks. For example, in January 2014, the City of Chicago reached an agreement with Election Systems & Software [3] to provide more than 2,100 ExpressPoll voter check-in and verification devices to support the city's 1.6 million registered voters.[4] The e-pollbook system was first used in Chicago's 2014 primary elections.
Issues
[edit]In 2023 a contractor, WSD Digital, developing a voter registration and e-pollbook system for New Hampshire put in code to link to websites in Russia and used open source software managed by a Russian. New Hampshire found those issues by hiring another company, ReversingLabs, to review the code of the first company.[5]
In 2020 Williamson County TX found two problems: that its use of e-pollbooks sometimes assigned the wrong ballot style to voters, so they voted on contests outside their area, and did not vote on contests in their own area; and that some ballots did not display the voters' precincts.[6]
In 2006, at least two vendors had problems with e-pollbooks, including Diebold in Maryland in September 2006[7] and Sequoia Voting Systems in Denver, Colorado in November 2006.[8]
References
[edit]- ^ Electronic Poll Books https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/electronic-pollbooks.aspx
- ^ Orange County Registrar of Voters (2017-04-02). "Voter's Choice Act Versus Traditional Election Models" (PDF). California Association of Clerks and Elections Officials.
- ^ Election Systems & Software We Support Elections
- ^ "After Primary Election Success with Electronic Poll Books_ Chicago and ES&S Look Ahead to November". article.wn.com.
- ^ Sakellariadis, John (2024-09-01). "Hacking blind spot: States struggle to vet coders of election software". Politico.
- ^ Appel, Andrew (2023-02-17). "Unrecoverable Election Screwup in Williamson County TX". Freedom to Tinker. Retrieved 2023-02-17.
- ^ "Maryland Election Glitches Prompt Investigation". Fox News. 2006-09-13. Retrieved 2009-12-22.
- ^ Human, Katy (2006-11-16). ""Shocking" election omission". The Denver Post. Retrieved 2009-12-22.
 | This election-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |