Jump to content

Draft talk:X-ray nanoprobe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disambiguation for Transmission

[edit]

There is a link to Transmission in the page. That page is a disambiguation page, and the link on this page should be changed to link to one of the pages referenced by the Transmission page. Unfortunately, I'm not really sure what to link it to, and it's possible that what it should be linked to is something like Transmission (optics), which doesn't exist as yet. Anyway, if some expert on this subject can take a look at this, it would be great -- thanks!! ArglebargleIV 02:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I took care of this. If a more complete article is written at transmission (optics), then the link can be redirect, but transmittance is appropriate.--MikeJ9919 09:14, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No refs?

[edit]

See above.

Reads like an ad

[edit]

This things reads like an ad. Headbomb {— The greatest sin is willful ignorance.
ταλκ / κοντριβς/Projects of the Week
15:36, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very misleading

[edit]

The term 'x-ray nanoprobe' generally refers to all physical experiments working by this principle and not only the one at the Argonne National Lab. Such experiments exist around the world, let me give you some examples:

Also in the US there are several x-ray nanoprobes, e.g. HXN at Brookhaven National Lab: https://www.bnl.gov/ps/beamlines/beamline.php?r=3-ID

This article should really explain the working principle of such experiments in general and not one specific experiments out of a dozen or so. 131.169.225.49 (talk) 08:02, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]