This page is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This page is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
@RJG11: This draft currently reads as promotional. Sections without sources need to have sources added.
I suppose you could improve it by making a better connection between Shapley and the program. The program is not mentioned in the prize citation, nor on Shapley's Wikipedia page, so you have a missing link. Notability is not inherited, so you will not have helped demonstrate the notability of the program even if you do link its notable faculty members.
Your other two citations have problems. The URL you've given to ProQuest does not lead readers to the article you wished to cite. And the Lumiere page is not quite independent reporting about the program; it's more akin to self-published content we see on blogs. Still lots of work to do to demonstrate that you have a notable subject. For more information about the criteria for notability that apply, see WP:Notability (organizations and companies). — jmcgnh(talk)(contribs)20:08, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
