Draft talk:Stalwart Mail Server

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Software: Computing

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
	This page is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Declined submission

Thank you for taking the time to review my submission and for providing feedback on the draft.

I based the structure and content of the article on existing Wikipedia entries for similar open-source mail server software such as Dovecot, Apache James, and Courier Mail Server. These articles do not seem to include references to multiple published sources either, and rely largely on official product documentation, which is quite common for technical software entries. Given that Stalwart Mail Server is also software, I followed a similar approach by referencing its official documentation and other publicly accessible repositories. I believe the current draft offers more depth and detail, especially in comparison to the other mail server entries mentioned.

Regarding the requirement for independent sources, I would like to clarify that I am a user of this software but do not participate in its development. I created the draft to contribute to the open-source community because I noticed that Stalwart Mail Server is already listed on the List of mail servers Wikipedia page, but it lacks a dedicated entry. I hoped that this article could fill that gap.

I would be grateful if you could provide additional guidance on how I can improve the article to meet the requirements for publication, particularly regarding independent and reliable sources.

Once again, thank you for your time and consideration. Rustacian (talk) 14:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]