Draft talk:Sigma male
 | This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Alpha and beta male Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Alpha and beta male |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
 | This redirect was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 29 November 2021. The result of the discussion was retarget. |
 | The contents of the Draft:Sigma male page were merged into Alpha and beta male on September 26, 2023 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Bruh
[edit]bruh does this really need to exist? 209.221.91.105 (talk) 19:23, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- this is great, saving a link before i try to revertWeigurde 11:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
andrew tate?
[edit]some people think he is a sigma GarethBaloney (talk) 21:44, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Why.
[edit]Why is this on Wikipedia. Tell me why? Because like that same person who commented on the talk page of Skibidi Toilet is right about this. 2601:406:4200:8E90:99C3:2C97:6734:A4E8 (talk) 18:54, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- Well, the same reason as any page's reason for existence: because there's a large amount of reliable, significant coverage for it. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 19:20, 16 September 2023 (UTC)