Talk:Sangramsingh Thakur

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 October 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

20th Century Studios Low‑importance

	20th Century Studios portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject 20th Century Studios, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 20th Century Studios and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.20th Century StudiosWikipedia:WikiProject 20th Century StudiosTemplate:WikiProject 20th Century Studios20th Century Studios articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles

WP:RM

How to add tag of WP:RM in article Rajmama (talk) 21:12, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason to do that, @Rajmama:. --bonadea contributions talk 07:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello user:bonadea, Draft:Sangramsingh Thakur he worked in notable film and series which is also available on Wikipedia and also added reliable sources which supports to his projects and also have some WP:ref which show that he worked in notable film and series and you also removed his name from Indian Predator: Murder In A Courtroom why? Rajmama (talk) 20:02, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rajmama: The Murder in a Courtroom article had Thakur's name listed in the infobox as a starring part, which is clearly not the case. None of the sources in that article mentions his name, but evidently he played one of the murder victims – not a main role, and so shouldn't be listed unless independent sources have discussed his role in the series. --bonadea contributions talk 15:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea thakur is a parallel lead actor in this series he played the role of Avinash Tiwari, Akku Yadav's Best Friend role and there have many significant coverage available on Google. Rajmama (talk) 04:06, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

notability

Answering a question posted at my user talk.

@Rajmama, which three and only three of the sources do you believe are the very best three to support a claim to notability? Each of the three needs to provide significant coverage in a reliable source that is independent of the subject. Please don't give me more than three. Valereee (talk) 15:14, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

From what I can see, none of these sources help support a claim to notability. Times of India is known for paid entertainment coverage, and the remaining sources also don't help. Valereee (talk) 16:00, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And another at AfD talk: the reason for nominating the article for deletion is that the subject does not appear to be notable. Valereee (talk) 16:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Valereee Can we remove it back to draft? Rajmama (talk) 23:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rajmama:, the reason it is being considered for deletion is because I do not believe it is notable. You will see a short summary of this at the top of the deletion discussion. @Valereee:, I would be against moving it back to draft. It was previously declined at least three times at AfC, then moved to the mainspace by creator. Of course I am only one opinion but Rajmama is welcome to participate in the AfD with the request. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41@ValereeeI know this has been declined in drafts before, and the reason for that was that the sources were not supportable. But this time, I added the supportable sources to it and then shifted it from draft to article space, but after having a conversation with @Valereee I came to know that the sources of Times of India would not be valid. That's why I'm asking that it be moved back to the draft area so I can add proper sources. Rajmama (talk) 06:57, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And one more thing, I do not edit in laptop or computer, I edit from mobile. For this, I cannot use the tools of Wikipedia which have many features. For this, whatever subject I am sending from draft to article space. I look at it in full details, I study it and then I send it from draft to article space and I especially like to work on the actors of Hindi film cinema and Marathi film cinema and the Cast & Crew. because I know about them and who is more Popular here in India and Maharashtra and I contributed according to. I don't have any connection with anyone. I don't charge single penny to anyone. I feel that I should contribute and that's why I do it. Rajmama (talk) 07:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. However, it doesn't make sense to me as experience tells me that someone moving a draft to article space after numerous declines is done because they want the article published and no longer care about the AfC process. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41What do you mean Doesn't make sense? Rajmama (talk) 09:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Attack

@Valereee I think @CNMall41 is taking it personally. Rajmama (talk) 09:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no idea what you mean. Taking what personally? Valereee (talk) 10:11, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't take anything personally, especially when it comes to the internet. If you feel I am doing something egregious, please notify the proper noticeboard as I am subject to sanctions just like every other editor. You were advised to make your case for draftify by engaging in the deletion discussion; however, you resorted to borderline WP:ASPERSIONS. I would also suggest taking a look at WP:CANVASSing. I will again suggest, and actually encourage, to make your case in the discussion. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:04, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]