Draft talk:Monacogate

Neutrality issues

Hey!

I have draftified the article as its current state violates the principles of neutrality and biographies of living persons. The article appears biased to me, as certain facts are presented in an incomplete manner that could mislead readers. After reviewing the sources and biographies of the persons involved, it seems that the content is shaped in a way that lacks objectivity. I've also examined other contributions made by this article’s author and found similar issues on pages related to Bouvier, Rybolovlev, and their dispute, where edits do not appear neutral. Additionally, there have been prior allegations regarding the author’s conflict of interest. I will invite fellow users from the Neutrality Project to review this case.

Always open and happy to discuss and work together on it. Li1411 (talk) 21:23, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, @Li1411!

I agree - this draft needs a careful, thorough review to get it in line with Wikipedia’s standards. The topic is tricky, and I can see how some parts could feel one-sided, especially with how certain allegations are framed. This isn’t something we should rush through.

I noticed you took out a few parts when you draftified it - should we think about reworking those sections instead of cutting them entirely? Some of the details might still be relevant if we adjust the tone or add more context. It’ll take some time, but this way we won’t lose important information that could add to the article’s depth.

I’ll be in and out, so I might not be able to work on this consistently, but I’ll pitch in when I can. I’d suggest we go section by section, taking a closer look at the language around Rybolovlev’s alleged misconduct and balancing it with more context on the legal outcomes and Bouvier’s side. Let’s work through this patiently and make sure each edit brings it closer to a balanced and factual tone.

Best, LucasJanssen4444 (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]