Draft talk:List of Dungeons & Dragons 5th edition monsters

This draft was nominated for deletion on 24 September 2019. The result of the discussion was delete.

This page is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Lists

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles

Challenge Ratings

I don't think we need the Challenge Ratings. First of all, it's best to avoid adding material that is overly game-focused to these monster listings. (Note the many, many individual D&D monster entries lack CR listings, or any other game statistics.) Second, anyone who wants the CRs can use the link to the Monsters by Challenge Rating document in the references. So unless someone objects, I was planning on removing the CRs within the next few days. Let us know here if you can think of a good reason to keep them, though!

I'm also not sure about the creature types, though I wasn't going to bother with removing them (there's more non-gamer value there). — Preceding unsigned comment added by JEB215 (talk • contribs) 08:14, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Probably better to remove the CRs, yes. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 17:50, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One vote for "yes" and none against, so I'll start removing them with this update. JEB215 (talk) 03:53, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the Monster Type is very useful to find monsters by type, otherwise you'd have to check each monster one by one (or have another page that lists monsters by type?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexis Wilke (talk • contribs) 10:05, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Dungeons & Dragons 5th edition monsters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150105203849/http://archive.wizards.com/DnD/Article.aspx?x=dnd%2Fduad%2F20090401 to http://archive.wizards.com/DnD/Article.aspx?x=dnd%2Fduad%2F20090401

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]