Jump to content

Draft talk:Linda Litteral

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Source assessment

[edit]
Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
SD Voyager No Interview No
The San Diego Union-Tribune (subscription required) No Based on what Litteral wrote and said; very little WP:SECONDARY analysis. Freelance writer - likely paid piece Yes Yes Fairly substantial piece about her book and exhibition No
Sparks Gallery No Interview No
San Diego Magazine No 2 paragraphs announcing exhibition No
Liberty Station No Mere mention No
The San Diego Union-Tribune (subscription required) No Short Q&A (five questions) with Litteral Yes No Announcement of exhibition No
Eugene Scene No Excessively based on what she said Yes No
California Lawyers for the Arts No Does not mention Litteral No
There San Diego No Mere mention No
OUR Arts Foundation No Litteral most likely provided the bio; video is her talking about herself Yes No reason to doubt it Yes Biography, plus 9-minute video where Litteral talks about herself No
SHOUTOUT SOCAL No Interview Yes No
Issuu No Press release from publisher Yes No
Herald and News (can't be accessed from Europe) No Says "according to a news release" No 6-7 paragraphs announcing an exhibition No
Artillery Magazine No Just an announcement of an exhibition No
WOODTV No Based on what she said No
mlive No 2 short paragraphs, one quoting Litteral No
Curating On Campus Yes Student magazine, but no reason to think this article isn't reliable No No mention of Litteral No
The Power of Expressing Your Feelings Through Art No Article is based on what the gallery director said, and what Litteral said Yes Student magazine, but no reason to think this article isn't reliable Yes 7 paragraphs No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]