Talk:Julian Agyeman

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Articles for creation C‑class

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article was accepted from this draft on 29 October 2018 by reviewer DGG (talk · contribs).

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it outlines the accomplishment of an academic in a similar manner to other notable academics. I understand the concern and I will work to fix the article within the week. I see how the tone could be interpreted as promotional, but it was not the intention of the article. The parts that I assume are the problematic are the parts that I added to show that he met notability standards, but were not intended to promote this person. The rest of the article was written in a very standard manner and I will edit it to fix this issue. Rnf1811 (talk) 23:36, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]