Draft talk:Greg O’Gallagher

This draft was nominated for deletion on 10 January 2023. The result of the discussion was IAR Draftify.

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this draft duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/05/03/this-guy-became-a-millionaire-at-24-by-taking-his-shirt-off-on-youtube.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. VickKiang (talk) 00:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I haven't entered cv in the decline, this seems to be borderline copyvio (flagged by Earwig as possible, two sentences are copied) and revision deletion might be declined. Nevertheless, User:ManyKinds, closely paraphrasing and copying phrases is still unacceptable, please have a look at this notice. Thank you. VickKiang (talk) 00:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This website it terrible.

Biased and stupid decisions are being made when it involves drafts. Admins contradict themselves and give stupid and petty reasons to why they made their decision. I strongly recommend that you don’t use this website as the people who work on here don’t actually know what they’re doing. ManyKinds (talk) 11:35, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declining and accepting drafts is common practice and is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation. If you have issues with the decline it would be appreciated if you could articulate why the two declines and the subsequent revdel is incorrect, such as which sources demonstrate notability. Many thanks. VickKiang (talk) 08:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]