Draft talk:Anjal Prakash

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This page is supported by the science and academia work group.

India

This page is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles

Asia

	Asia portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
	This article was created or improved during WikiProject Asia's "Asian 10,000 Challenge", which started in October 2016 and is still continuing. You can help!

Request for Feedback on Notability and Neutrality

Hi everyone,

I’ve recently revised the draft article for Anjal Prakash after receiving feedback that the previous version relied too heavily on primary sources and did not clearly establish notability. I’ve added secondary sources and focused on meeting the WP:NPROF guidelines.

Could someone please review the draft and provide feedback on whether it now meets Wikipedia’s notability and neutrality requirements? Any suggestions for improvement would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you! Mr. Vikash Thakur (talk) 10:45, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]