Draft talk:Aave Protocol

This draft was nominated for deletion on 16 July 2024. The result of the discussion was soft delete.

WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS

The article Draft:Aave Protocol, along with other pages relating to blockchain and cryptocurrencies, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:

Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

Remedy instructions and exemptions

Enforcement procedures:

Violations of any restrictions (excluding 1RR/reverting violations) and other conduct issues should be reported to the administrators' incidents noticeboard. Violations of revert restrictions should be reported to the administrators' edit warring noticeboard.
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.

With respect to any reverting restrictions:

Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

Aave should be notable enough

Aave is one of the top 70 coins on Coinmarketcap, so I'm quite sure that this is notable enough for Wikipedia. Cenerivesuvio (talk) 15:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article was soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aave Protocol. See [1]

I am an enthusiast on notable, more widely used crypto protocols and would like to request an undeletion. The reason I created this article is because I'm trying to fill a knowledge gap in what crypto enthusiast community considers to be useful.

There was only one user who voted and stated that it seems like it was "written for a cryptocurrency enthusiast audience ... although I am not sure to what extent this is considered when deliberating deletion."

The community, particularly other users who actually know more about the topic and know which crypto protocols and platforms are supposed to be notable, did not have a chance to comment. I was busy in real life and did not have a chance to respond, but I am completely sure that Aave is notable enough for Wikipedia.

1. In terms of market capitalization, Aave Protocol is currently at #51. Please consult the Aave page at https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/aave/

It means that Aave is #51 widely used and circulated cryptocurrency as of now.

Over half of all Wikipedia articles about cryptocurrencies do not even reach #51 on https://coinmarketcap.com/ For example, EOS.IO is at #78 in comparison. Please see the ranking on the CoinMarketCap's main page.

2. If you often visit websites that offer payments in about a dozen cryptocurrencies, you will frequently see Aave listed as one of the payment options, along with Litecoin and also Avalanche (blockchain platform) and Verge (cryptocurrency). All of these are already on Wikipedia.

3. Aave Protocol has been been studied and cited in peer-reviewed academic journals. Please see for example:

Is decentralized finance actually decentralized? A social network analysis of the Aave protocol on the Ethereum blockchain https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.08401

Liquidity Risks in Lending Protocols: Evidence from Aave Protocol https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.11973

We can use these citations to make the article look more technical, scholarly, and academic.

Doing a basic Google search for "Aave" (which also stands for various other things) is not a good way to tell if Aave Protocol is supposed to be notable or not for Wikipedia, because Google search rankings don't prioritize scholarly papers over crypto blogs and news sites. We need to check journals and scholarly work as well. On the other hand, non-notable crypto articles would be about newfangled crypto platforms and protocols that hardly anyone uses, and no peer-reviewed academic journals would ever cite them.

4. Aave is already on the Persian Wikipedia, at fa:پروتکل Aave, and my impression is that the Persian Wikipedia does not have much tolerance for non-notable topics. From what I can see, this version seems like it is written encyclopedically, so we can use this version to expand into English.

Conclusion: These are solid reasons for why the article should not have been hastily deleted without wider community consensus, and should thus be undeleted. The Aave Protocol complements Wikipedia's current coverage on cryptocurrency topics and does not fail GNG critera. Thanks for taking the time to read through this. —Cenerivesuvio (talk) 19:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This makes sense. I actually know quite a bit about all the major altcoins, and I'm absolutely sure that Aave is notable enough. for example, there are a series of sites that specifically accept payment in Litecoin, Monero, Bitcoin Cash, Dash, Dogecoin, Zcash, Ripple, Tron, Aave (Etherium), and Stellar. In fact, I'm actually surprised that it's not on Wikipedia yet. One thing: I really think that the article title should be Aave rather than Aave Protocol though. Newatlascamels (talk) 18:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]