Draft:Testing Accommodations
Submission declined on 11 September 2024 by Utopes (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 7 June 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission. Declined by Bonadea 5 months ago. |
- Comment: The types section is entirely unreferenced. Reads like a promotional piece Utopes (talk / cont) 23:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I think that the current version of the page is very USA focused, but could be useful addition to Category:Disability accommodations. However, unless the content is globalized, this content is better served to flesh out Disability_in_the_United_States#Education_2 and Inclusion_(disability_rights)#Inclusion_in_the_United_States. Mason (talk) 15:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Testing accommodations include a wide variety of changes to standardized testing administration rules that govern time, presentation, response, and setting.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) recognizes that testing accommodations are an important requirement for ensuring all Americans have fair access to education and career pathways. This act defines testing accommodations as "changes to the regular testing environment and auxiliary aids and services that allow individuals with disabilities to demonstrate their true aptitude or achievement level on standardized exams or other high-stakes tests".[1]
Testing accommodations include a wide variety of changes to standardized testing administration rules that govern time, presentation, response, and setting. The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing provide some guidance on how testing accommodation decisions should be made to ensure these changes alter the construct being measured or the comparability of test scores.
Recently, the international testing community has begun to explore how to provide testing accommodations on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) standardized tests that compare performance across the world[2].[3]
Types of Testing Accommodations
[edit]The most commonly requested accommodation on admissions and licensure tests is extended testing time. While read-aloud or text to speech is the most common accommodation on K12 state assessments due to their more generous time limits. The Americans with Disabilities Act lists the following types of testing accommodations:
- Braille or large-print exam booklets;
- Screen reading technology;
- Scribes to transfer answers to Scantron bubble sheets or record dictated notes and essays;
- Extended time;
- Wheelchair-accessible testing stations;
- Distraction-free rooms;
- Physical prompts (such as for individuals with hearing impairments); and
- Permission to bring and take medications during the exam
Research
[edit]A large body of research has been conducted on testing accommodations. Perhaps the largest collection of resources is housed by the National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) at the University of Minnesota. The NCEO Accommodation Toolkit[4] includes reviews of state testing accommodation policy and research articles. In addition, many state departments of education in the United States have funded research to examine the validity and usability of different testing accommodations and universal tools (accommodations built into test delivery platforms for all test takers).[5]
Flagging Accommodated Test Scores
[edit]Prior to 2002, most large testing companies followed a practice of 'flagging' test scores taken with testing accommodations.[6] The practice was due to a lack of psychometric evidence that tests take with and without testing accommodations were 'psychometrically comparable.' However, a lawsuit by a test taker resulted in Educational Testing Service and the College Board conducting research to answer this question. While the studies showed that extended testing time did slightly overpredict first-year grade point average (FGPA).[7] In February 2001, ETS President Kurt Landgraf determined that this was negligible relative to the negative impact of flagging on people with disabilities.[8] The College Board and ACT quickly followed suit and stopped the practice for most tests.
References
[edit]- ^ "ADA Requirements: Testing Accommodations". www.ada.gov. United States Department of Justice and Civil Rights.
- ^ "Mapping Study for the Integration of Accommodations for Students with Special Education Needs (SEN) in PISA". www.oecd.org. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
- ^ "Special Needs Feasibility Study" (PDF). www.OECD.org. OECD.
- ^ "Accommodations Toolkit".
- ^ "Usability, Accessibility, and Accommodations Guidelines" (PDF). www.SmarterBalanced.org. Smarter Balanced.
- ^ "Disabling the SAT". Education Next. 13 July 2006.
- ^ Laitusis, Cara Cahalan (8 August 2014). "Predictive Validity of SAT® I: Reasoning Test for Test-Takers with Learning Disabilities and Extended Time Accommodation". College Entrance Examination Board Research Reports. 05 (2002). doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2002.tb01878.x.
- ^ New York Times (8 February 2001). "Disabled Win Halt to Notations Of Special Arrangements on Tests, 02/08/2001". The New York Times.