Draft:Napoleonic looting of art in Spain
Submission declined on 21 February 2024 by Stuartyeates (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
- Comment: This is going to need much better sourcing. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
The art looting carried out by the Napoleonic troops and the government of Joseph Bonaparte —imposed by his brother Napoleon— during the War of the Spanish independence (1808-1814) was, from the cultural point of view, the plunder more important suffered by Spain.
Context
[edit]Napoleon began his looting of the artistic heritage in Belgium and the Netherlands in 1794, with the excuse of creating the Napoleon Museum, a synthesis of world art, a symbol of power and culture, which would later become the Louvre museum. The plundering cuntinues in Italy, in 1796, and during his campaigns in Egypt from 1798 to 1801, Napoleon obtained, for example, the Rosetta stone. Napoleon was the first systematizing this theft of art in modern times. He wanted to appropriate that greatness and increase the funds of the Louvre museum, which at the time was already among the best in the world. The process used by Napoleon, his officials and generals was:
- Looting under death threats, led by army generals.
- Official seizure with the excuse of creating a National Museum.
- Selection of works by specialized dealers, such as J. B. Lebrun.
- Transfer of the selected works to Paris.
- Incorporation of the works to the Louvre Museum or sale to other collectors.
The artistic heritage was considered «public utility», a cultural contribution that has to be to the service of the State, by what the works have to translate to France, as dominant state on Europe.
Looting in Spain
[edit]When the troops of Napoleon arrived to Spain, they had been plundering Europe for a decade. With the Royal decree of 18 July 1809 suppressed the masculine religious orders and all his heritage passed to the State, included the art works. Also, the invasors accumulated the pictures from the aristocracy, whom were punished with the confiscation of the art collections.
The plundering of art works in Spain was carried out by diverse ways. The first, the most important, went the intention to create a big national museum, the Museum Josefino in the palace of Buenavista, to image of the museum of the Louvre.[1] The museum served of excuse to requisition pictures. They accumulate the paintings in deposits, where the deterioration by humidities and bad storage, but especially the corruption of military and French attendants did that numerous works disappeared. It was the case of Frédéric Quilliet and his group —Maignien, Napoli and the english G. A. Wallis—, commissioned to look for and requisition the necessary pictures, that resulted so corrupt that in 1810 was separated of his place forthat.[2] Later it appointed a commission of experts headed by Denon, the director of the Louvre. Denon selected himself 250 paintings more than the original planned, as a «compensation by the military campaign of Spain».
From Madrid and surroundings they took out more than 1500 pictures and of Seville some 1000. About 300 of these pictures —although, no of the best— and the Treasure of the Dolphin were sent to Paris in May of 1813. Joseph Bonaparte employed the enormous quantity of art accumulated as gifts for his friends, as the active generals in the Iberian peninsula, between them Darmagnac, Caulaincourt, Eblé, Faviers, Sebastiani and Desolles.
Some dealers were also very active with looting, especially the french Quilliet and others, like Lebrun, Maignain, the british Nathan and Wallis, and the dutch Coesvelt, specialised in following the trail of the French troops. Also there was covert operations, like the fraudulent sale of the Venus of the mirror by Quilliet to Wallis, served them to obtain pictures.
Especially the art in silver suffered a extreme looting: small and medium size objects, easily transportables and that they can be melted in ingots without leaving trace. The town of Saragosse serve as an example. There is studies about the cases of Navarra, Calahorra, Guipúzcoa or Segovia.
Marshal Soult
[edit]Jean-de-Dieu Soult had a meteoric military career; to the 25 years did him general and in 1804 delivered him the clave of marshal. From 1810 it acted in Spain, first as commander of the 2º body of the Big Army in Spain and Portugal and from 1810 as military Governor of Andalucia. During this time took an impressive particular collection of more than 180 pictures.
The depredación of Soult arrived to such point, that Napoleon would affirm, «I would have to give an example and order fusilar to Soult, the elder saqueador between them [the marshals].»
To the death of Soult the collection, that had achieved a considerable fame, was auctioned. Real houses and museums of all the world of rushed to bid, by what the pictures of the collection remained delivered by the four continents.
End of looting
[edit]After the French defeat in the Battle of Arapiles, on July 18, 1812, José Bonaparte decided to leave Madrid and head to France in a huge caravan of more than 2,000 cars, the famous "baggage of King Joseph", to which Benedict Pérez Galdós dedicated one of his national episodes with that same title. The battle of Vitoria prevented the entourage from reaching France and Joseph Bonaparte had to flee on horseback and leave all his luggage behind him. The troops, more than half of whom were British, greedily raided the tanks and forgot to pursue Joseph Bonaparte, leading Wellington to affirm that "the British soldier is the scum of the Earth, he enlists for a drink". The looted works of art were lost among countless others lost in the War.
The larger paintings and sculptures were saved from plunder thanks to the fact that General Maucune had been twelve hours ahead of the king's caravan and the objects were able to reach Paris without incident. These paintings would be among those that could be recovered later thanks to the action of General Álava.
Wellington immediately sent the 300 recovered works to his brother, Henry Wellesley, in England. Upon his return to Great Britain, Wellington decided on his own to return the paintings, so his brother, Henry, at that time ambassador in Madrid, sent a letter to Ferdinand VII in 1814, informing him that he was in possession of the artistic treasure. After receiving no response, he tried again in September 1816 in a letter to Fernán Núñez, the Spanish ambassador in London.
He receives the following letter:
Hon. Mister. Dear Duke: I have accompanied you with the official response that I have received from the Court and from it I deduce that His Majesty, moved by your delicacy, does not wish to deprive you of what came into your possession by means that are as fair as they are honorable. Such is my opinion of the case, and so I believe that you should leave the matter as it is and not refer to it further... the devoted friend and affectionate cousin of his who greets you. Fernán Núñez
Thus, Ferdinand VII left the paintings definitively in the hands of Wellington, "The Spanish gift", who hung them in his house, Apsley House, which has become a museum belonging to English Heritage.
Recovery of some paintings
[edit]General Álava was commissioned by the government of Ferdinand VII to recover the paintings stolen by the French generals. After various letters requesting the paintings, in an interview with King Louis XVIII he got the answer "I neither give them, nor am I opposed." The next day, September 23, Nicolás Minussir, Álava's assistant, along with the painter Francisco Lacoma and 200 armed English infantry went to the Louvre museum with the intention of recovering the paintings. There was strong opposition from the museum director, Vivant Denon, who flatly refused to hand over any paintings, and even from the people of Paris, which led to tense situations, but 12 paintings were managed to be removed. The next day they went early to avoid problems and managed to remove another 284 paintings and 108 various objects. The objects were stored in the Spanish embassy in Paris, to be sent to Brussels and then by ship from Antwerp to Cádiz, to avoid transport by land through France and risk incidents due to the resistance of the French. They arrived at the San Fernando Academy of Fine Arts, in Madrid, on June 30, 1816.
Lavallée confirmed on March 10, 1816 that a total of 2,065 paintings had been returned, of which Saxony (Dresden) recovered 421, Austria 323, Spain 284 (in addition to 108 miscellaneous objects), Brunswick 230, Netherlands 210, Schwerin 190 , Prussia 119 (in addition to 268 bronzes and 463 cameos); Tuscany 57, Sardinia 59, Modena 24, Venice 15, Verona 6, Milan 7, etc. Eight paintings of Spanish painting remained in the Louvre. It is estimated that approximately half of the looted works did not return to their places of origin; the vast majority stayed in France.
Final dispersion
[edit]Starting in the 1820s, looted paintings began to be sold in France. On the one hand, there was always the possibility that Spain would demand the paintings back, on the other, it was not very well seen to decorate the walls with stolen paintings. Heirs often preferred money to art works.
The Spanish government tried to recover some paintings, even by purchasing them, but it was not possible to do so with many. For example, Soult flatly refused to sell anything that was not for astronomical prices, let alone deliver them, so it was thought of going through the courts, to ask for receipts for the sales, but Soult was protected as a Minister of Defense and later as president of the Council of Ministers of King Louis Philippe of Orleans. Not even King Louis Philippe was able to get his collection sold to the French state for a reasonable price. It was not until his death in 1851 that his sons decided to sell the collection: 163 paintings, of which 110 were Spanish. The main buyers were the Louvre, the National Gallery and the Tsar of Russia, among others.
Auction houses such as Erard, Boursault, Frainays or Huard, and individuals continued to regularly sell paintings from Spain. Still in 1857 the collection of General d'Armagnac was sold and in 1868 that of Colonel Lejeune. These paintings mostly ended up in the Louvre, the National Gallery in London, the Hermitage in Saint Petersburg and the Museum of Fine Arts in Budapest. A few others ended up in the Wallace Collection, the Walker Art Gallery in Liverpool, the Palazzo Bianco in Genoa, and the national galleries in Washington and Ottawa.
References
[edit]- ^ "Quilliet, Frédéric". Museo del Prado (in Spanish). Retrieved 6 September 2020.
- ^ "El Expolio del Patrimonio Español durante la guerra de Independencia". Fundación Carlos Ballesta López (in Spanish). 19 February 2013. Archived from the original on 3 July 2020. Retrieved 6 September 2020.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.