Draft:Kieran Murphy (physician)
Submission declined on 27 July 2024 by Mgp28 (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 26 February 2024 by Ldm1954 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to Declined by Ldm1954 8 months ago.
|
- Comment: The title of this draft either has been disambiguated or will need to be disambiguated for acceptance.If this draft is accepted, the disambiguation page will need to be edited. Either an entry will need to be added, or an entry will need to be revised.The disambiguation page for the primary name is Kieran Murphy (disambiguation). Robert McClenon (talk) 05:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This article has major problems, with format error, only primary sources and a lot of peacock (bragging). It needs a major rewrite. Ldm1954 (talk) 11:02, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Professor Kieran Murphy MB BAO BCH FRCPC FSIR is a clinician, researcher, teacher and mentor, and an inventor of medical devices and techniques. Professor Murphy is a full-time physician and Interventional Neuroradiologist at Toronto Western Hospital.[1]
From 2012 to 2018 he was Director of Clinical Faculty at the Techna Research Institute for the Advancement in Technology for Health.[2]
Prof. Murphy has filed 81 patents throughout his career. He has started eight medical device companies, authored 196 peer reviewed publications, and published several textbooks. His papers have been cited 7,720 times, and Research Gate has ranked him in the top 1 percent of their 15 million academic members. He has a H-index of 45.[3]
He develops techniques to treat spine fractures and has invented devices to successfully carry these procedures. He developed a unique 18 cm long needle that allows bilateral sacral fractures at the base of the spine to be infused with bone cement and avoid the need for invasive surgery.[4] His needles, bone cements, injection systems, and the modifications he has made to CT scanners and angiography are used by physicians around the world.
He has written about creativity and invention, the conditions that allow it to flourish, and the work and personalities that inspire him. His writing has been published in the Toronto Star,[5][6][7] and the National Post.[8] His first book, The Essence of Invention, will be published in June 2024 by Dundurn Press.[9]
References
[edit]- ^ "UHN Research". Retrieved 26 February 2024.
- ^ "Techna Institute". UHN Research. Retrieved 26 February 2024.
- ^ "Research Gate". Research Gate. Retrieved 26 February 2024.
- ^ "US Patents". Justia patents. Retrieved 26 February 2024.
- ^ Star, Toronto (14 July 2022). "Debunking the myth that creativity and usefulness decline with age". Toronto Star. Retrieved 26 February 2024.
- ^ Star, Toronto (27 August 2022). "Create opportunities for immigrants and amazing things can happen". Toronto Star. Retrieved 26 February 2024.
- ^ Star, Toronto (31 December 2022). "Canada's health-care system inhibits innovation by design. The result is medical mediocrity". Toronto Star. Retrieved 26 February 2024.
- ^ Post, National. "Canada should follow Ireland's path to a thriving economy". National Post. Post Media. Retrieved 26 February 2024.
- ^ Press, Dundurn. "The Essence of Invention". Dundurn Press. Retrieved 26 February 2024.
This submission has now been cleaned of the above-noted copyright violation and its history redacted by an administrator to remove the infringement. If re-submitted (and subsequent additions do not reintroduce copyright problems), the content may be assessed on other grounds.