Draft:Framework bias
Submission declined on 8 November 2024 by KylieTastic (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Framework bias occurs when researcher's thinking becomes overly reliant on a particular mental model or framework, limiting the ability to consider alternative perspectives or solutions[1]. This can happen when we use a familiar framework to analyze a new situation without fully considering its unique characteristics[1]. As a result, researchers may miss important details, make inaccurate assumptions, or fail to generate creative solutions [1]. To mitigate framework bias, it's essential to actively seek out diverse perspectives, challenge our own assumptions, and be open to alternative frameworks [1].
[[:Category:Science]]
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d McKercher, Bob; Moyle, Brent (2025-02-01). "Beware of framework bias". Tourism Management. 106: 104992. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104992. ISSN 0261-5177.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.