Draft:Eidson v. South Carolina Department of Education
 | Draft article not currently submitted for review.
This is a draft Articles for creation (AfC) submission. It is not currently pending review. While there are no deadlines, abandoned drafts may be deleted after six months. To edit the draft click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. To be accepted, a draft should:
It is strongly discouraged to write about yourself, your business or employer. If you do so, you must declare it. Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Last edited by JJMC89 bot (talk | contribs) 1 second ago. (Update) |
Eidson v. South Carolina Department of Education, Appellate case no. 2023-001673, was a landmark decision of the South Carolina Supreme Court, in which the court declared that the Education Scholarship Trust Fund Act of South Carolina, the state law that allow the private institutions to directly use the public fund was unconstitutional.
| Eidson, et al. v. South Carolina Department of Education, et al. | |
|---|---|
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
| Decided | September 11, 2024 |
| Transcript | https://law.justia.com/cases/south-carolina/supreme-court/2024/28235.html |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | John W. Kittredge |