Draft:Dubuito
Submission declined on 8 November 2024 by KylieTastic (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
DUBUITO: lying about what year it is for political gain
Popular literature shows that political parties have used what they claim facts are for not just enslaving people but also demeaning their character, kings may have ruled in the united states once and like many castles destroyed by an emperor; so to does the schemetic that politicians use not often change but so to does ruling affect even from corporations lead to dissaray. Law is not the format of application nor indecisive libraries of knowledge; the burning of books many people know classically as 1984; but rather described the actual era that many claim they will not return to. The ability of a ruling power to using information to lying to their youth and the adults they would circumnavigate is not a new one; the immortal arguement over whose the oldest immortal is just as deadly. Spelling of words and writings of books would be nothing in a competition of knowledge but neither is a library pass that of questionable either. Some may have turned to trying to lessen the blow.
This game of uncertainty spawned from PLaying the game "dubious" (clearly knowing a fact that thus is circumspect) albiet which parties is the topic of debate of the game dubuito that modern world and politicians play with information.
There is no fake news, there is no scam; a processor can only read so many files on a boot menu; a shoe still requires mending; the access to information is what they play as most dubious; it is a skepticism game that people will toy with facts; and an entirely defacto manner to assuming their own importance.
like one could say if cartoons were evidence of facts that much of it was dubious becuase it had been annotated and wasn't news, even though perhaps it would tell a different story. The ghost in the shell is where we go for our definition of dubuitto;
Someday when time frames are easily lied about in cyberbotofiction will cartoons be legal entity? a dubious idea right
Politicians and ruling parties even religions have been known to lying about facts since each of there faculties began, and game the library has usually been able to searching larger databases for
like in the ghost in the shell that made it to 2030, the years circumvent leading around 2024 were openly known of as the downfall of the second king of sloth, and the end of the trep kings of the 70s; including the first sloth trep king. They originally played the game dubuitto where they would claim that they either perpetually lived further in the future that regular people, or would toy making large places where they would try to convincing other people it was before certian eras of technology.
Update (rules and regulations given "the game dubuitto" (fact-premise)
References
[edit]/prompt. the 7 deadly kings of sin and sloth
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.