Draft:Dena Shottenkirk
| Submission declined on 16 September 2024 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 1 April 2024 by Paul W (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Paul W 7 months ago. | |
Comment: Fails WP:NPROF. The citation style and cited sources definitely need a closer inspection. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 15:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Unclear that this individual meets WP:GNG, WP:BIO or WP:NACADEMIC. Article has numerous assertions that are not supported by inline citations. Significant coverage about Shottenkirk (not just works by her) in reliable, independent, secondary sources is needed to meet Wikipedia guidelines on notability Paul W (talk) 15:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 | A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. |
Dena Shottenkirk is an American moral and political philosopher, artist, and founder of the art and public philosophy nonprofit talkPOPc,[1] whose work centers on the intersection of epistemology, perception, and aesthetics.[2] She is an Associate Professor at Brooklyn College, City University of New York.[3]
Education
[edit]Shottenkirk has a BA in philosophy and art from the University of Kansas (1977)[4] and an MFA from the Mason Gross School of the Arts of Rutgers University (1981).[4] Shottenkirk received her doctorate in philosophy from the CUNY Graduate Center in 2005.[4]
Career
[edit]Shottenkirk was a staff art critic for Artforum[5] and Art in America[6] magazines, and an artist represented by Postmaster Gallery (NYC). She has received numerous awards,[7] including a Fulbright Scholar fellowship,[7] published three books on philosophy and has had numerous exhibitions of her artwork.[8]
Research areas
[edit]Shottenkirk's philosophical research focuses on the ways epistemology dovetails with aesthetics, with particular concern regarding issues of perception.[9] Emphasizing the role of gist perception (the first approximate 300ms.) Shottenkirk has developed a theory that explains how the initial gist perception influences both the objective content that we perceive as well as our subjective assessment.[10] In this, she has joined recent research in philosophy that has shown a willingness to diverge from the traditional emphasis on beauty in aesthetics, and to instead focus on the function of art in the formation of social beliefs.[11][12] Her research and writing on Nominalism, with a specific focus on Nelson Goodman, has been extensively cited by publications and other scholars.[13][14][15][16][17]
Publications
[edit]As author
[edit]- Art as Cognition - Framing the Aesthetic Experience as a Conversation, Springer, forthcoming 2024[citation needed]
- Cover up the Dirty Parts!: Funding, Fighting, and the First Amendment, Cambridge Scholars Press, 2010, ISBN 978-1443830171[18]
- Nominalism and Its Aftermath: The Philosophy of Nelson Goodman, Springer, 2009, ISBN 978-9048182237[2]
Further Readings
[edit]- Book Review: "Weaving a nominalist conception of nature, science and art"[19]
- Book Review: "Nominalism And Its Aftermath: The Philosophy of Nelson Goodman [Book Review]"
References
[edit]- ^ "Who we are". talkPOPc.
- ^ a b Shottenkirk, Dena, ed. (2009). Nominalism and Its Aftermath. Synthese Library. Vol. 343. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9931-1. ISBN 978-1-4020-9930-4.
- ^ "Faculty Profile".
- ^ a b c "Dena Shottenkirk". Brooklyn College.
- ^ "Artforum Articles".
- ^ "ARTnews Articles". 19 November 2019.
- ^ a b "4 Specialists".
- ^ "Bio". Dena Shottenkirk.
- ^ Hakli, R.; Mäkelä, P.; Seibt, J. (2023-01-24). Social Robots in Social Institutions: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2022. IOS Press. ISBN 978-1-64368-375-1.
- ^ Cheng, Tony; Deroy, Ophelia; Spence, Charles (2019-05-29). Spatial Senses: Philosophy of Perception in an Age of Science. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-351-37818-5.
- ^ Jackson, Louvenia (2020-02-21). Cultural Humility in Art Therapy: Applications for Practice, Research, Social Justice, Self-Care, and Pedagogy. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. ISBN 978-1-78592-644-0.
- ^ 1Macleod and 2Holdridge, 1Katy and 2Lin (2011). The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts. Routledge. pp. 354, 367. ISBN 978-0-203-84132-7.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ Giovannelli, Alessandro (2005-05-07). "Goodman's Aesthetics". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- ^ Coldron, J. (August 27, 2010). "Nelson Goodman's general theory of symbols: can it help characterize some educational concerns?" (PDF). Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive.
- ^ Prospero, Alfonso Di (2017-12-03). "Art, knowledge and induction". Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio. 11 (2). ISSN 2036-6728.
- ^ Juvshik, Tim (September 2013). Realism and the Background of Goodman's Worldmaking. Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
- ^ Feldman, Matthew (2014-04-01). Falsifying Beckett: Essays on Archives, Philosophy, and Methodology in Beckett Studies. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-3-8382-6706-7.
- ^ Cover up the Dirty Parts!.
- ^ Bantinaki, Katerina (2011-11-01). "Weaving a nominalist conception of nature, science and art". Metascience. 20 (3): 565–568. doi:10.1007/s11016-010-9487-z. ISSN 1467-9981.
External links
[edit]