Jump to content

Draft:Contemporary jurisprudence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contemporary Jurisprudence is a school of thoughts regarding jurisprudence which places greater emphasis on increasing the degree of democracy with a view to achieving absolute democratic status and increasing the effectiveness, transparency and the efficiency of the judicial system. In the following series of Jurisprudence, Contemporary Jurisprudence criticizes the current democratic system on the following grounds:

  1. The Parliament | Legislative Assembly | Governing body can never be considered an absolute representation of the State Republic. This is because the personal interests of the elected person can never be the same as those of the State Republic (according to Contemporary Jurisprudence). This means that, the current democratic system worldwide shall be declared null and void.
  2. The State Judicial System has been declared an organ of the State and must never be treated as an independent organ of the State. This means that current judicial systems Worldwide have been declared null and void.
  3. In present democratic system, only members of Parliament and the Legislature follow the election procedure, while other institutions (such as the Judiciary and the Bureaucracy) do not.

Rules of Contemporary Jurisprudence

[edit]

The Father of Contemporary Jurisprudence, Mr. Deepak Sharma, proposed it be based on rules such as:

A. The dual representation of the democratic system - (Parliament and Society representation)

B. Dual representation of the Judicial System - (representation of the Judiciary and Society)

C. Centralized trial procedure of the Judicial System - Fair trial procedure (J.I.T)

Proposed Democratic System under Contemporary Jurisprudence

[edit]

Proposed Judicial System under Contemporary Jurisprudence

[edit]

Impact of Contemporary Jurisprudence upon upcoming Democratic System

[edit]

Proposed impact of Contemporary Jurisprudence on Political Science

[edit]

Proposed impact of Contemporary Jurisprudence on Social Structure in term of Religion, Economic class.

[edit]

[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Garg, Atul. "Whether Contemporary Jurisprudence is Capable for Uniform Governance Worldwide Analysis of Impact of Contemporary Jurisprudence upon Communist Ideology". Scope Journal (13–3): 666–674.
  2. ^ Kumar, Amit (July 16, 2023). "School of Contemporary Jurisprudence". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4512116. SSRN 4512116. Retrieved 2023-12-26.
  3. ^ Gupta, Shakshi (2022). "समकालीन न्यायशास्त्र का स्कूल". iPleaders (in Hindi). Retrieved 2023-12-26.
  4. ^ Northrop, F. S. C. (1952). "Contemporary Jurisprudence and International Law". The Yale Law Journal. 61 (5): 623–654. doi:10.2307/793514. ISSN 0044-0094. JSTOR 793514.
  5. ^ Ravi, Ajit (2023). "School of Contemporary Jurisprudence". International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research. 5 (4). doi:10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i04.5188. Retrieved 2023-12-26.
  6. ^ Ashu, Ashutosh (2023). "Biography of Deepak Sharma". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4539730. SSRN 4539730. Retrieved 2023-12-26.
  7. ^ Sharma, Suresh (2021). "School of contemporary jurisprudence". iPleaders. Retrieved 2023-12-26.
  8. ^ Legal Desire (2021). "Whether School of Contemporary Jurisprudence is Competent for the Next Democratic Judicial Revolution". Legal Desire. Retrieved 2023-12-26.
  9. ^ "India to attain intellectual capability of Judiciary Engineering". News Nation. 2021. Retrieved 2023-12-26.
  10. ^ "समकालीन न्यायिक शास्त्र के द्वारा न्यायिक व्यवस्था 25 गुना तेज व 20 गुना ज्यादा पारदर्शी होगी: दीपक शर्मा | the judicial system will be 25 times faster and 20 times more transparent by contemporary judicial science". Patrika. 2020. Retrieved 2023-12-26.
  11. ^ Rathore, Rishika (2021). "Feminism in Modern Jurisprudence". iPleaders. Retrieved 2023-12-26.
  12. ^ Ahmed, Lavish (2023). "Whether India Gets the Intellectual Capability of Jurisprudence through the School of Contemporary Jurisprudence". IJLMH. 6 (5): 1193–1198.
  13. ^ Sinha, Rashika (2023). "An Analysis for Consideration the Impact of School of Contemporary Jurisprudence on Futuristic Civilisation". Journal of Legal Studies & Research. 09 (5): 16–26. doi:10.55662/JLSR.2023.9501. S2CID 263814133.
  14. ^ Gorshi, Tanya. "Development of Justice in Indian Jurisprudence with Special Reference to Amartya Sen's Idea of Justice". Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research. 3: 1. Retrieved 2023-12-26.
  15. ^ Agarwal, Vani; Pandey, Ayushi (2023). "The Mapping of World's Futuristic Civilization". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4636878. ISSN 1556-5068.
  16. ^ Jurist, Prime; ago (2023-07-07). "School of Contemporary Jurisprudence – primejurist.com". Retrieved 2023-12-28.
This page will be placed in the following categories if it is moved to the article namespace.
Categories:

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Contemporary_jurisprudence&oldid=1226849408"