Draft:Anna Stork
Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,064 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 16 November 2024 by Qcne (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
Submission declined on 15 November 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by KylieTastic 31 hours ago. |
Submission declined on 15 November 2024 by HitroMilanese (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by HitroMilanese 34 hours ago. |
Submission declined on 15 November 2024 by Grahaml35 (talk). The structure needs to be fixed along with dead end. Declined by Grahaml35 34 hours ago. |
- Comment: This is written like a journalist piece, not an encyclopedic article. qcne (talk) 20:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Too many WP:PRIMARY sources, requires independent reliable sources KylieTastic (talk) 20:47, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Anna Stork is an American inventor and entrepreneur who co-founded LuminAID[1], a company that produces inflatable solar-powered lanterns. These lanterns were created to provide portable and reliable lighting in areas and regions recovering from disasters that are without stable access to electricity. Her work has contributed to humanitarian aid efforts and the continued development of sustainable lighting solutions.
Education and Early Career
Stork graduated from Dartmouth College in 2008 with a degree in engineering sciences and studio art[2]. Her studies combined technical and creative disciplines. After Dartmouth, she pursued a Master of Architecture at Columbia University’s Graduate School of Architecture, Planning, and Preservation[3]. While attending Columbia, the 2010 earthquake in Haiti[4] inspired her professor to change the focus of the class to disaster relief for a studio project[5]. Stork, along with her classmate Andrea Sreshta, developed the concept for a solar-powered inflatable lantern. The design addressed the lack of safe and accessible lighting in disaster zones and eventually became the core idea behind LuminAID[6].
Founding LuminAID
Stork and Sreshta launched LuminAID in 2011[7]. The initial lantern design was inflatable and lightweight, making it easy to transport and use in emergencies. It could be charged using solar power, which offered a sustainable and affordable solution to areas without electricity. The original model required users to inflate the lantern by blowing air into a valve. However, further versions introduced a twist-to-inflate system for convenience. In 2014, Stork and Sreshta went on Shark Tank[8], where they pitched LuminAID to a panel of investors. All five panelists made offers, but the co-founders ultimately accepted Mark Cuban’s proposal of $200,000 for a 15% stake in the company[9].
Product Design and Features
LuminAID’s PackLite Nova USB lantern is compact, durable, and designed for use in humanitarian and recreational contexts[10]. It is waterproof, floatable, and dustproof, making it suitable for a variety of environments[11]. The lantern can be charged via solar power in approximately ten hours or through USB in one to two hours[12]. Depending on the brightness setting, the lanterns provide light for three to 24 hours, with outputs ranging from 12 to 75 lumens[13].
Impact and humanitarian efforts
LuminAID’s products have been distributed in over 100 countries and are widely used in disaster response efforts[14]. They are also popular with outdoor enthusiasts and are sold in retail stores like REI and online. The company’s Give Light, Get Light program enables customers to donate lanterns to needy people[15]. Through this initiative, more than 50,000 lanterns have been distributed to communities recovering from disasters or living in underserved areas[16]. LuminAID has also partnered with organizations like buildOn to promote education and literacy[17]. For example, in 2018, the company provided lanterns to women in rural areas, helping them access light for reading and studying[18].
Acquisition and Legacy
In 2021, LuminAID was acquired by Adventure Ready Brands, a move that allowed the company to expand its reach and operations[19]. Stork’s work in creating sustainable and portable lighting solutions has had a significant impact on disaster relief efforts and humanitarian aid, helping address the challenges faced by communities without reliable electricity.
References
[edit]- ^ Anna Stork. (n.d.) Anna Stork - co-founder of LuminAID [Linkedin Page]. Retrieved December 5, 2022 from https://www.linkedin.com/in/astorka/
- ^ Anna Stork. (n.d.) Anna Stork - co-founder of LuminAID [Linkedin Page]. Retrieved December 5, 2022 from https://www.linkedin.com/in/astorka/
- ^ Anna Stork. (n.d.) Anna Stork - co-founder of LuminAID [Linkedin Page]. Retrieved December 5, 2022 from https://www.linkedin.com/in/astorka/
- ^ United Nations. (2022, January 12). UN marks anniversary of devastating 2010 Haiti earthquake | UN news. United Nations. Retrieved December 6, 2022, from https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/01/1109632#:~:text=On%2012%20January%202010%2C%20a,%2C%20known%20as%20MINUSTAH%2C%20collapsed
- ^ Seliger, D. (2012, January 4). The bright side of disaster relief: An interview with Anna Stork of LuminAID. Retrieved from https://www.core77.com/posts/21457/The-Bright-Side-of-Disaster-Relief-an-Interview-with-Anna-Stork-of-LuminAID
- ^ LuminAID. (2018, August 2). Solar solutions for disaster relief. Retrieved from https://luminaid.com/blogs/notes-from-the-field/solar-solutions-for-disaster-relief
- ^ LuminAID. (n.d.). About LuminAID. Retrieved from https://luminaid.com/pages/about-luminaid
- ^ LuminAID. (2015, August 1). Our Shark Tank experience and why we went with Mark Cuban. Retrieved from https://luminaid.com/blogs/news/our-shark-tank-experience-and-why-we-went-with-mark-cuban
- ^ LuminAID. (2015, August 1). Our Shark Tank experience and why we went with Mark Cuban. Retrieved from https://luminaid.com/blogs/news/our-shark-tank-experience-and-why-we-went-with-mark-cuban
- ^ Perten, K. (2021, May 23). These top-rated solar lanterns provide light just about anywhere. Mic. Retrieved December 6, 2022, from https://www.mic.com/impact/the-8-best-solar-lanterns-77134858
- ^ Perten, K. (2021, May 23). These top-rated solar lanterns provide light just about anywhere. Mic. Retrieved December 6, 2022, from https://www.mic.com/impact/the-8-best-solar-lanterns-77134858
- ^ Perten, K. (2021, May 23). These top-rated solar lanterns provide light just about anywhere. Mic. Retrieved December 6, 2022, from https://www.mic.com/impact/the-8-best-solar-lanterns-77134858
- ^ Perten, K. (2021, May 23). These top-rated solar lanterns provide light just about anywhere. Mic. Retrieved December 6, 2022, from https://www.mic.com/impact/the-8-best-solar-lanterns-77134858
- ^ LuminAID. (n.d.). Give light, get light program. LuminAID. https://luminaid.com/pages/give-light-get-light
- ^ LuminAID. (n.d.). Give light, get light program. LuminAID. https://luminaid.com/pages/give-light-get-light
- ^ LuminAID. (n.d.). Give light, get light program. LuminAID. https://luminaid.com/pages/give-light-get-light
- ^ LumanAID. (2021, February 28). Notes from the Field: An Update from buildOn’s Adult Literacy Program. Retrieved from https://luminaid.com/blogs/notes-from-the-field/an-update-from-buildon-s-adult-literacy-program
- ^ LumanAID. (2021, February 28). Notes from the Field: An Update from buildOn’s Adult Literacy Program. Retrieved from https://luminaid.com/blogs/notes-from-the-field/an-update-from-buildon-s-adult-literacy-program
- ^ LuminAID. (2022, April 14). LuminAID’s Next Adventure. Retrieved from https://luminaid.com/blogs/news/luminaid-adventure-ready-brands?srsltid=AfmBOoqOAdse59Cb59ytnz1eD9bLa_RBD0JH0Zo1a5oHunPoyaSfdjxR