Draft:Accreditation Commission on Colleges of Medicine

Submission declined on 5 October 2024 by S0091 (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by S0091 2 seconds ago. Last edited by S0091 2 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Comment: In addition to no sources to support any of the content, this is written like it is their website rather than a neutral encyclopedia article. S0091 (talk) 21:33, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Accreditation Commission on Colleges of Medicine (ACCM)

The Accreditation Commission on Colleges of Medicine (ACCM) is an independent, not-for-profit organization based in the Republic of Ireland. Established to uphold excellence in medical education, the ACCM provides accreditation services to medical schools in countries that may not have a national medical accreditation body.

History and Mission

The ACCM was founded with the mission to ensure high standards in medical education globally. It is invited by governments to act on their behalf in accrediting medical education programs within their jurisdictions. The commission operates independently of the countries it serves and the educational programs it inspects and accredits.

Structure and Governance

The ACCM is composed of senior medical educators and a lay member representing the public. This diverse composition ensures that the commission’s accreditation processes are thorough and unbiased. The commissioners are responsible for evaluating medical schools based on a comprehensive set of standards that cover various aspects of medical education, including curriculum, faculty, student support services, and facilities.

Accreditation Standards

The ACCM’s accreditation standards are designed to ensure that medical schools provide high-quality education that meets international benchmarks. These standards include: Mission and Educational Goals: Ensuring that medical schools have clear, well-defined educational goals.

School Management: Evaluating the administrative and governance structures of medical schools.

Faculty and Teaching Staff: Assessing the qualifications, workload, and professional development of faculty members.

Curricular Content: Reviewing the curriculum to ensure it covers essential medical knowledge and skills.

Student Support Services: Ensuring that students have access to academic guidance, health services, and financial support.

Global Impact

The ACCM’s work contributes to the global effort to maintain and improve the quality of medical education. By providing accreditation services, the ACCM helps medical schools achieve recognition and credibility, which is crucial for their graduates to pursue further training and practice medicine internationally.

Recent Developments

In recent years, the ACCM has continued to update its standards and processes to reflect the evolving needs of medical education. The commission’s annual reports provide insights into its activities and the outcomes of its accreditation reviews.

References

https://$3