Draft:AI slop
 | Draft article not currently submitted for review.
This is a draft Articles for creation (AfC) submission. It is not currently pending review. While there are no deadlines, abandoned drafts may be deleted after six months. To edit the draft click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. To be accepted, a draft should:
It is strongly discouraged to write about yourself, your business or employer. If you do so, you must declare it. Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Last edited by Broc (talk | contribs) 5 months ago. (Update) |
 | This article may incorporate text from a large language model. (June 2024) |
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
AI slop is a term used to describe unwanted or low-quality large language model (LLM) artificial intelligence (AI)-generated content. This includes text, images, and other media produced by LLMs that is often considered irrelevant, inaccurate, or generally undesirable. The term was popularized by Twitter user deepfates and has been adopted more broadly to capture the growing problem of low-quality AI content proliferating online.[1]
Origin and usage
[edit]AI slop is analogous to "spam", which describes unwanted email communications. The term highlights the need for better oversight and curation of AI outputs to prevent the spread of misleading or trivial information.[2]
Examples
[edit]AI slop can manifest in various forms, such as:
- Erroneous recommendations: AI-generated travel guides or articles that provide inappropriate or incorrect suggestions, like listing a food bank as a tourist attraction.[2]
- Misleading images: AI-generated images that are inaccurate or bizarre, often circulating on social media platforms.
- Flooded search results: Search engines displaying low-quality AI-generated content at the top of results, which users must sift through to find accurate information.
Ethical considerations
[edit]The proliferation of AI slop has raised significant ethical concerns. Critics argue that there should be more stringent controls and reviews for AI-generated content to ensure its quality and relevance. This perspective is part of a broader discussion on AI ethics, emphasizing responsible usage of AI technology to avoid the spread of misinformation and low-value content.[1][3]
In an article titled "Publishing AI Slop is a Choice", John Gruber argues that the decision to publish low-quality AI-generated content is a conscious one. The piece emphasizes the responsibility of publishers to maintain high standards and avoid contributing to the spread of AI slop.[3]
Impact
[edit]The impact of AI slop is multifaceted:
- User Experience: Users experience frustration and wasted time navigating through irrelevant or incorrect AI-generated content.
- Content Quality: The overall quality of information available online can degrade if AI slop becomes prevalent.
- Trust in AI: Overexposure to low-quality AI content can erode public trust in AI technologies and their applications.[2]
References
[edit]- ^ a b Willison, Simon (8 May 2024). "Slop is the new name for unwanted AI-generated content". Retrieved 25 May 2024.
- ^ a b c Porter, Amanda (20 May 2024). "Spam, junk … slop? The latest wave of AI behind the 'zombie internet'". GIA Data Hub. Retrieved 25 May 2024.
- ^ a b Gruber, John (24 May 2024). "Publishing AI Slop is a Choice". Daring Fireball. Retrieved 25 May 2024.