The Dixon elliptic functions cm, sm applied to a real-valued argument x . Both functions are periodic with real period π 3 ≈ 5.29991625
In mathematics, the Dixon elliptic functions sm and cm are two elliptic functions (doubly periodic meromorphic functions on the complex plane ) that map from each regular hexagon in a hexagonal tiling to the whole complex plane. Because these functions satisfy the identity
cm
3
z
+
sm
3
z
=
1
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cm} ^{3}z+\operatorname {sm} ^{3}z=1}
, as real functions they parametrize the cubic Fermat curve
x
3
+
y
3
=
1
{\displaystyle x^{3}+y^{3}=1}
, just as the trigonometric functions sine and cosine parametrize the unit circle
x
2
+
y
2
=
1
{\displaystyle x^{2}+y^{2}=1}
.
They were named sm and cm by Alfred Dixon in 1890, by analogy to the trigonometric functions sine and cosine and the Jacobi elliptic functions sn and cn; Göran Dillner described them earlier in 1873.[ 1]
The functions sm and cm can be defined as the solutions to the initial value problem :[ 2]
d
d
z
cm
z
=
−
sm
2
z
,
d
d
z
sm
z
=
cm
2
z
,
cm
(
0
)
=
1
,
sm
(
0
)
=
0
{\displaystyle {\frac {d}{dz}}\operatorname {cm} z=-\operatorname {sm} ^{2}z,\ {\frac {d}{dz}}\operatorname {sm} z=\operatorname {cm} ^{2}z,\ \operatorname {cm} (0)=1,\ \operatorname {sm} (0)=0}
Or as the inverse of the Schwarz–Christoffel mapping from the complex unit disk to an equilateral triangle, the Abelian integral :[ 3]
z
=
∫
0
sm
z
d
w
(
1
−
w
3
)
2
/
3
=
∫
cm
z
1
d
w
(
1
−
w
3
)
2
/
3
{\displaystyle z=\int _{0}^{\operatorname {sm} z}{\frac {dw}{(1-w^{3})^{2/3}}}=\int _{\operatorname {cm} z}^{1}{\frac {dw}{(1-w^{3})^{2/3}}}}
which can also be expressed using the hypergeometric function :[ 4]
sm
−
1
(
z
)
=
z
2
F
1
(
1
3
,
2
3
;
4
3
;
z
3
)
{\displaystyle \operatorname {sm} ^{-1}(z)=z\;{}_{2}F_{1}{\bigl (}{\tfrac {1}{3}},{\tfrac {2}{3}};{\tfrac {4}{3}};z^{3}{\bigr )}}
Parametrization of the cubic Fermat curve [ edit ]
The function t ↦ (cm t , sm t ) parametrizes the cubic Fermat curve, with area of the sector equal to half the argument t .
Both sm and cm have a period along the real axis of
π
3
=
B
(
1
3
,
1
3
)
=
3
2
π
Γ
3
(
1
3
)
≈
5.29991625
{\displaystyle \pi _{3}=\mathrm {B} {\bigl (}{\tfrac {1}{3}},{\tfrac {1}{3}}{\bigr )}={\tfrac {\sqrt {3}}{2\pi }}\Gamma ^{3}{\bigl (}{\tfrac {1}{3}}{\bigr )}\approx 5.29991625}
with
B
{\displaystyle \mathrm {B} }
the beta function and
Γ
{\displaystyle \Gamma }
the gamma function :[ 5]
1
3
π
3
=
∫
−
∞
0
d
x
(
1
−
x
3
)
2
/
3
=
∫
0
1
d
x
(
1
−
x
3
)
2
/
3
=
∫
1
∞
d
x
(
1
−
x
3
)
2
/
3
≈
1.76663875
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\tfrac {1}{3}}\pi _{3}&=\int _{-\infty }^{0}{\frac {dx}{(1-x^{3})^{2/3}}}=\int _{0}^{1}{\frac {dx}{(1-x^{3})^{2/3}}}=\int _{1}^{\infty }{\frac {dx}{(1-x^{3})^{2/3}}}\\[8mu]&\approx 1.76663875\end{aligned}}}
They satisfy the identity
cm
3
z
+
sm
3
z
=
1
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cm} ^{3}z+\operatorname {sm} ^{3}z=1}
. The parametric function
t
↦
(
cm
t
,
sm
t
)
,
{\displaystyle t\mapsto (\operatorname {cm} t,\,\operatorname {sm} t),}
t
∈
[
−
1
3
π
3
,
2
3
π
3
]
{\displaystyle t\in {\bigl [}{-{\tfrac {1}{3}}}\pi _{3},{\tfrac {2}{3}}\pi _{3}{\bigr ]}}
parametrizes the cubic Fermat curve
x
3
+
y
3
=
1
,
{\displaystyle x^{3}+y^{3}=1,}
with
1
2
t
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {1}{2}}t}
representing the signed area lying between the segment from the origin to
(
1
,
0
)
{\displaystyle (1,\,0)}
, the segment from the origin to
(
cm
t
,
sm
t
)
{\displaystyle (\operatorname {cm} t,\,\operatorname {sm} t)}
, and the Fermat curve, analogous to the relationship between the argument of the trigonometric functions and the area of a sector of the unit circle.[ 6] To see why, apply Green's theorem :
A
=
1
2
∫
0
t
(
x
d
y
−
y
d
x
)
=
1
2
∫
0
t
(
cm
3
t
+
sm
3
t
)
d
t
=
1
2
∫
0
t
d
t
=
1
2
t
.
{\displaystyle A={\tfrac {1}{2}}\int _{0}^{t}(x\mathop {dy} -y\mathop {dx} )={\tfrac {1}{2}}\int _{0}^{t}(\operatorname {cm} ^{3}t+\operatorname {sm} ^{3}t)\mathop {dt} ={\tfrac {1}{2}}\int _{0}^{t}dt={\tfrac {1}{2}}t.}
Notice that the area between the
x
+
y
=
0
{\displaystyle x+y=0}
and
x
3
+
y
3
=
1
{\displaystyle x^{3}+y^{3}=1}
can be broken into three pieces, each of area
1
6
π
3
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {1}{6}}\pi _{3}}
:
1
2
π
3
=
∫
−
∞
∞
(
(
1
−
x
3
)
1
/
3
+
x
)
d
x
1
6
π
3
=
∫
−
∞
0
(
(
1
−
x
3
)
1
/
3
+
x
)
d
x
=
∫
0
1
(
1
−
x
3
)
1
/
3
d
x
.
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\tfrac {1}{2}}\pi _{3}&=\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }{\bigl (}(1-x^{3})^{1/3}+x{\bigr )}\mathop {dx} \\[8mu]{\tfrac {1}{6}}\pi _{3}&=\int _{-\infty }^{0}{\bigl (}(1-x^{3})^{1/3}+x{\bigr )}\mathop {dx} =\int _{0}^{1}(1-x^{3})^{1/3}\mathop {dx} .\end{aligned}}}
The Dixon elliptic function sm z in the complex plane, illustrating its double periodicity (ω = e 2πi /3 ).[ 7]
The function
sm
z
{\displaystyle \operatorname {sm} z}
has zeros at the complex-valued points
z
=
1
3
π
3
i
(
a
+
b
ω
)
{\displaystyle z={\tfrac {1}{\sqrt {3}}}\pi _{3}i(a+b\omega )}
for any integers
a
{\displaystyle a}
and
b
{\displaystyle b}
, where
ω
{\displaystyle \omega }
is a cube root of unity ,
ω
=
exp
2
3
i
π
=
−
1
2
+
3
2
i
{\displaystyle \omega =\exp {\tfrac {2}{3}}i\pi =-{\tfrac {1}{2}}+{\tfrac {\sqrt {3}}{2}}i}
(that is,
a
+
b
ω
{\displaystyle a+b\omega }
is an Eisenstein integer ). The function
cm
z
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cm} z}
has zeros at the complex-valued points
z
=
1
3
π
3
+
1
3
π
3
i
(
a
+
b
ω
)
{\displaystyle z={\tfrac {1}{3}}\pi _{3}+{\tfrac {1}{\sqrt {3}}}\pi _{3}i(a+b\omega )}
. Both functions have poles at the complex-valued points
z
=
−
1
3
π
3
+
1
3
π
3
i
(
a
+
b
ω
)
{\displaystyle z=-{\tfrac {1}{3}}\pi _{3}+{\tfrac {1}{\sqrt {3}}}\pi _{3}i(a+b\omega )}
.
On the real line,
sm
x
=
0
↔
x
∈
π
3
Z
{\displaystyle \operatorname {sm} x=0\leftrightarrow x\in \pi _{3}\mathbb {Z} }
, which is analogous to
sin
x
=
0
↔
x
∈
π
Z
{\displaystyle \sin x=0\leftrightarrow x\in \pi \mathbb {Z} }
.
Fundamental reflections, rotations, and translations[ edit ]
Both cm and sm commute with complex conjugation,
cm
z
¯
=
cm
z
¯
,
sm
z
¯
=
sm
z
¯
.
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\operatorname {cm} {\bar {z}}&={\overline {\operatorname {cm} z}},\\\operatorname {sm} {\bar {z}}&={\overline {\operatorname {sm} z}}.\end{aligned}}}
Analogous to the parity of trigonometric functions (cosine an even function and sine an odd function ), the Dixon function cm is invariant under
1
3
{\textstyle {\tfrac {1}{3}}}
turn rotations of the complex plane, and
1
3
{\textstyle {\tfrac {1}{3}}}
turn rotations of the domain of sm cause
1
3
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {1}{3}}}
turn rotations of the codomain:
cm
ω
z
=
cm
z
=
cm
ω
2
z
,
sm
ω
z
=
ω
sm
z
=
ω
2
sm
ω
2
z
.
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\operatorname {cm} \omega z&=\operatorname {cm} z=\operatorname {cm} \omega ^{2}z,\\\operatorname {sm} \omega z&=\omega \operatorname {sm} z=\omega ^{2}\operatorname {sm} \omega ^{2}z.\end{aligned}}}
Each Dixon elliptic function is invariant under translations by the Eisenstein integers
a
+
b
ω
{\displaystyle a+b\omega }
scaled by
π
3
,
{\displaystyle \pi _{3},}
cm
(
z
+
π
3
(
a
+
b
ω
)
)
=
cm
z
,
sm
(
z
+
π
3
(
a
+
b
ω
)
)
=
sm
z
.
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\operatorname {cm} {\bigl (}z+\pi _{3}(a+b\omega ){\bigr )}=\operatorname {cm} z,\\\operatorname {sm} {\bigl (}z+\pi _{3}(a+b\omega ){\bigr )}=\operatorname {sm} z.\end{aligned}}}
Negation of each of cm and sm is equivalent to a
1
3
π
3
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {1}{3}}\pi _{3}}
translation of the other,
cm
(
−
z
)
=
1
cm
z
=
sm
(
z
+
1
3
π
3
)
,
sm
(
−
z
)
=
−
sm
z
cm
z
=
1
sm
(
z
−
1
3
π
3
)
=
cm
(
z
+
1
3
π
3
)
.
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\operatorname {cm} (-z)&={\frac {1}{\operatorname {cm} z}}=\operatorname {sm} {\bigl (}z+{\tfrac {1}{3}}\pi _{3}{\bigr )},\\\operatorname {sm} (-z)&=-{\frac {\operatorname {sm} z}{\operatorname {cm} z}}={\frac {1}{\operatorname {sm} {\bigl (}z-{\tfrac {1}{3}}\pi _{3}{\bigr )}}}=\operatorname {cm} {\bigl (}z+{\tfrac {1}{3}}\pi _{3}{\bigr )}.\end{aligned}}}
For
n
∈
{
0
,
1
,
2
}
,
{\displaystyle n\in \mathbb {\{} 0,1,2\},}
translations by
1
3
π
3
ω
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {1}{3}}\pi _{3}\omega }
give
cm
(
z
+
1
3
ω
n
π
3
)
=
ω
2
n
−
sm
z
cm
z
,
sm
(
z
+
1
3
ω
n
π
3
)
=
ω
n
1
cm
z
.
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\operatorname {cm} {\bigl (}z+{\tfrac {1}{3}}\omega ^{n}\pi _{3}{\bigr )}&=\omega ^{2n}{\frac {-\operatorname {sm} z}{\operatorname {cm} z}},\\\operatorname {sm} {\bigl (}z+{\tfrac {1}{3}}\omega ^{n}\pi _{3}{\bigr )}&=\omega ^{n}{\frac {1}{\operatorname {cm} z}}.\end{aligned}}}
z
{\displaystyle z}
cm
z
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cm} z}
sm
z
{\displaystyle \operatorname {sm} z}
−
1
3
π
3
{\displaystyle {-{\tfrac {1}{3}}}\pi _{3}}
∞
{\displaystyle \infty }
∞
{\displaystyle \infty }
−
1
6
π
3
{\displaystyle {-{\tfrac {1}{6}}}\pi _{3}}
2
3
{\displaystyle {\sqrt[{3}]{2}}}
−
1
{\displaystyle -1}
0
{\displaystyle 0}
1
{\displaystyle 1}
0
{\displaystyle 0}
1
6
π
3
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {1}{6}}\pi _{3}}
1
/
2
3
{\displaystyle 1{\big /}{\sqrt[{3}]{2}}}
1
/
2
3
{\displaystyle 1{\big /}{\sqrt[{3}]{2}}}
1
3
π
3
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {1}{3}}\pi _{3}}
0
{\displaystyle 0}
1
{\displaystyle 1}
1
2
π
3
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {1}{2}}\pi _{3}}
−
1
{\displaystyle -1}
2
3
{\displaystyle {\sqrt[{3}]{2}}}
2
3
π
3
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {2}{3}}\pi _{3}}
∞
{\displaystyle \infty }
∞
{\displaystyle \infty }
More specific values [ edit ]
z
{\displaystyle z}
cm
z
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cm} z}
sm
z
{\displaystyle \operatorname {sm} z}
−
1
4
π
3
{\displaystyle {-{\tfrac {1}{4}}}\pi _{3}}
1
+
3
+
2
3
2
{\displaystyle {\frac {1+{\sqrt {3}}+{\sqrt {2{\sqrt {3}}}}}{2}}}
−
1
−
3
+
2
3
4
3
{\displaystyle {\frac {-1-{\sqrt {3+2{\sqrt {3}}}}}{\sqrt[{3}]{4}}}}
−
2
9
π
3
{\displaystyle -{\tfrac {2}{9}}\pi _{3}}
3
6
2
sin
(
1
9
π
)
{\displaystyle {\frac {\sqrt[{6}]{3}}{2\sin \left({\frac {1}{9}}\pi \right)}}}
−
2
cos
(
1
18
π
)
3
6
{\displaystyle -{\frac {2\cos \left({\frac {1}{18}}\pi \right)}{\sqrt[{6}]{3}}}}
−
1
9
π
3
{\displaystyle -{\tfrac {1}{9}}\pi _{3}}
2
sin
(
2
9
π
)
3
6
{\displaystyle {\frac {2\sin \left({\frac {2}{9}}\pi \right)}{\sqrt[{6}]{3}}}}
−
3
6
2
cos
(
1
18
π
)
{\displaystyle -{\frac {\sqrt[{6}]{3}}{2\cos \left({\frac {1}{18}}\pi \right)}}}
−
1
12
π
3
{\displaystyle -{\tfrac {1}{12}}\pi _{3}}
−
1
+
3
+
2
3
2
2
3
{\displaystyle {\frac {-1+{\sqrt {3}}+{\sqrt {2{\sqrt {3}}}}}{2{\sqrt[{3}]{2}}}}}
−
1
+
3
−
2
3
2
2
3
{\displaystyle {\frac {-1+{\sqrt {3}}-{\sqrt {2{\sqrt {3}}}}}{2{\sqrt[{3}]{2}}}}}
1
12
π
3
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {1}{12}}\pi _{3}}
−
1
+
3
+
2
3
4
3
{\displaystyle {\frac {-1+{\sqrt {3+2{\sqrt {3}}}}}{\sqrt[{3}]{4}}}}
1
+
3
−
2
3
2
{\displaystyle {\frac {1+{\sqrt {3}}-{\sqrt {2{\sqrt {3}}}}}{2}}}
1
9
π
3
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {1}{9}}\pi _{3}}
3
6
2
sin
(
2
9
π
)
{\displaystyle {\frac {\sqrt[{6}]{3}}{2\sin \left({\frac {2}{9}}\pi \right)}}}
2
sin
(
1
9
π
)
3
6
{\displaystyle {\frac {2\sin \left({\frac {1}{9}}\pi \right)}{\sqrt[{6}]{3}}}}
2
9
π
3
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {2}{9}}\pi _{3}}
2
sin
(
1
9
π
)
3
6
{\displaystyle {\frac {2\sin \left({\frac {1}{9}}\pi \right)}{\sqrt[{6}]{3}}}}
3
6
2
sin
(
2
9
π
)
{\displaystyle {\frac {\sqrt[{6}]{3}}{2\sin \left({\frac {2}{9}}\pi \right)}}}
1
4
π
3
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {1}{4}}\pi _{3}}
1
+
3
−
2
3
2
{\displaystyle {\frac {1+{\sqrt {3}}-{\sqrt {2{\sqrt {3}}}}}{2}}}
−
1
+
3
+
2
3
4
3
{\displaystyle {\frac {-1+{\sqrt {3+2{\sqrt {3}}}}}{\sqrt[{3}]{4}}}}
5
12
π
3
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {5}{12}}\pi _{3}}
−
1
+
3
−
2
3
2
2
3
{\displaystyle {\frac {-1+{\sqrt {3}}-{\sqrt {2{\sqrt {3}}}}}{2{\sqrt[{3}]{2}}}}}
−
1
+
3
+
2
3
2
2
3
{\displaystyle {\frac {-1+{\sqrt {3}}+{\sqrt {2{\sqrt {3}}}}}{2{\sqrt[{3}]{2}}}}}
4
9
π
3
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {4}{9}}\pi _{3}}
−
3
6
2
cos
(
1
18
π
)
{\displaystyle -{\frac {\sqrt[{6}]{3}}{2\cos \left({\frac {1}{18}}\pi \right)}}}
2
sin
(
2
9
π
)
3
6
{\displaystyle {\frac {2\sin \left({\frac {2}{9}}\pi \right)}{\sqrt[{6}]{3}}}}
5
9
π
3
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {5}{9}}\pi _{3}}
−
2
cos
(
1
18
π
)
3
6
{\displaystyle -{\frac {2\cos \left({\frac {1}{18}}\pi \right)}{\sqrt[{6}]{3}}}}
3
6
2
sin
(
1
9
π
)
{\displaystyle {\frac {\sqrt[{6}]{3}}{2\sin \left({\frac {1}{9}}\pi \right)}}}
7
12
π
3
{\displaystyle {\tfrac {7}{12}}\pi _{3}}
−
1
−
3
+
2
3
4
3
{\displaystyle {\frac {-1-{\sqrt {3+2{\sqrt {3}}}}}{\sqrt[{3}]{4}}}}
1
+
3
+
2
3
2
{\displaystyle {\frac {1+{\sqrt {3}}+{\sqrt {2{\sqrt {3}}}}}{2}}}
Sum and difference identities [ edit ]
The Dixon elliptic functions satisfy the argument sum and difference identities:[ 8]
cm
(
u
+
v
)
=
sm
u
cm
u
−
sm
v
cm
v
sm
u
cm
2
v
−
cm
2
u
sm
v
cm
(
u
−
v
)
=
cm
2
u
cm
v
−
sm
u
sm
2
v
cm
u
cm
2
v
−
sm
2
u
sm
v
sm
(
u
+
v
)
=
sm
2
u
cm
v
−
cm
u
sm
2
v
sm
u
cm
2
v
−
cm
2
u
sm
v
sm
(
u
−
v
)
=
sm
u
cm
u
−
sm
v
cm
v
cm
u
cm
2
v
−
sm
2
u
sm
v
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\operatorname {cm} (u+v)&={\frac {\operatorname {sm} u\,\operatorname {cm} u-\operatorname {sm} v\,\operatorname {cm} v}{\operatorname {sm} u\,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}v-\operatorname {cm} ^{2}u\,\operatorname {sm} v}}\\[8mu]\operatorname {cm} (u-v)&={\frac {\operatorname {cm} ^{2}u\,\operatorname {cm} v-\operatorname {sm} u\,\operatorname {sm} ^{2}v}{\operatorname {cm} u\,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}v-\operatorname {sm} ^{2}u\,\operatorname {sm} v}}\\[8mu]\operatorname {sm} (u+v)&={\frac {\operatorname {sm} ^{2}u\,\operatorname {cm} v-\operatorname {cm} u\,\operatorname {sm} ^{2}v}{\operatorname {sm} u\,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}v-\operatorname {cm} ^{2}u\,\operatorname {sm} v}}\\[8mu]\operatorname {sm} (u-v)&={\frac {\operatorname {sm} u\,\operatorname {cm} u-\operatorname {sm} v\,\operatorname {cm} v}{\operatorname {cm} u\,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}v-\operatorname {sm} ^{2}u\,\operatorname {sm} v}}\end{aligned}}}
These formulas can be used to compute the complex-valued functions in real components:[citation needed ]
cm
(
x
+
ω
y
)
=
sm
x
cm
x
−
ω
sm
y
cm
y
sm
x
cm
2
y
−
ω
cm
2
x
sm
y
=
cm
x
(
sm
2
x
cm
2
y
+
cm
x
sm
2
y
cm
y
+
sm
x
cm
2
x
sm
y
)
sm
2
x
cm
4
y
+
sm
x
cm
2
x
sm
y
cm
2
y
+
cm
4
x
sm
2
y
+
ω
sm
x
sm
y
(
cm
3
x
−
cm
3
y
)
sm
2
x
cm
4
y
+
sm
x
cm
2
x
sm
y
cm
2
y
+
cm
4
x
sm
2
y
sm
(
x
+
ω
y
)
=
sm
2
x
cm
y
−
ω
2
cm
x
sm
2
y
sm
x
cm
2
y
−
ω
cm
2
x
sm
y
=
sm
x
(
sm
x
cm
x
cm
2
y
+
sm
y
cm
3
x
+
sm
y
cm
3
y
)
sm
2
x
cm
4
y
+
sm
x
cm
2
x
sm
y
cm
2
y
+
cm
4
x
sm
2
y
+
ω
sm
y
(
sm
x
cm
3
x
+
sm
x
cm
3
y
+
cm
2
x
sm
y
cm
y
)
sm
2
x
cm
4
y
+
sm
x
cm
2
x
sm
y
cm
2
y
+
cm
4
x
sm
2
y
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\operatorname {cm} (x+\omega y)&={\frac {\operatorname {sm} x\,\operatorname {cm} x-\omega \,\operatorname {sm} y\,\operatorname {cm} y}{\operatorname {sm} x\,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}y-\omega \,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}x\,\operatorname {sm} y}}\\[4mu]&={\frac {\operatorname {cm} x(\operatorname {sm} ^{2}x\,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}y+\operatorname {cm} x\,\operatorname {sm} ^{2}y\,\operatorname {cm} y+\operatorname {sm} x\,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}x\,\operatorname {sm} y)}{\operatorname {sm} ^{2}x\,\operatorname {cm} ^{4}y+\operatorname {sm} x\,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}x\,\operatorname {sm} y\,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}y+\operatorname {cm} ^{4}x\,\operatorname {sm} ^{2}y}}\\[4mu]&\qquad +\omega {\frac {\operatorname {sm} x\,\operatorname {sm} y(\operatorname {cm} ^{3}x-\operatorname {cm} ^{3}y)}{\operatorname {sm} ^{2}x\,\operatorname {cm} ^{4}y+\operatorname {sm} x\,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}x\,\operatorname {sm} y\,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}y+\operatorname {cm} ^{4}x\,\operatorname {sm} ^{2}y}}\\[8mu]\operatorname {sm} (x+\omega y)&={\frac {\operatorname {sm} ^{2}x\,\operatorname {cm} y-\omega ^{2}\,\operatorname {cm} x\,\operatorname {sm} ^{2}y}{\operatorname {sm} x\,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}y-\omega \,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}x\,\operatorname {sm} y}}\\[4mu]&={\frac {\operatorname {sm} x(\operatorname {sm} x\,\operatorname {cm} x\,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}y+\operatorname {sm} y\,\operatorname {cm} ^{3}x+\operatorname {sm} y\,\operatorname {cm} ^{3}y)}{\operatorname {sm} ^{2}x\,\operatorname {cm} ^{4}y+\operatorname {sm} x\,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}x\,\operatorname {sm} y\,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}y+\operatorname {cm} ^{4}x\,\operatorname {sm} ^{2}y}}\\[4mu]&\qquad +\omega {\frac {\operatorname {sm} y(\operatorname {sm} x\,\operatorname {cm} ^{3}x+\operatorname {sm} x\,\operatorname {cm} ^{3}y+\operatorname {cm} ^{2}x\,\operatorname {sm} y\,\operatorname {cm} y)}{\operatorname {sm} ^{2}x\,\operatorname {cm} ^{4}y+\operatorname {sm} x\,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}x\,\operatorname {sm} y\,\operatorname {cm} ^{2}y+\operatorname {cm} ^{4}x\,\operatorname {sm} ^{2}y}}\end{aligned}}}
Multiple-argument identities [ edit ]
Argument duplication and triplication identities can be derived from the sum identity:[ 9]
cm
2
u
=
cm
3
u
−
sm
3
u
cm
u
(
1
+
sm
3
u
)
=
2
cm
3
u
−
1
2
cm
u
−
cm
4
u
,
sm
2
u
=
sm
u
(
1
+
cm
3
u
)
cm
u
(
1
+
sm
3
u
)
=
2
sm
u
−
sm
4
u
2
cm
u
−
cm
4
u
,
cm
3
u
=
cm
9
u
−
6
cm
6
u
+
3
cm
3
u
+
1
cm
9
u
+
3
cm
6
u
−
6
cm
3
u
+
1
,
sm
3
u
=
3
sm
u
cm
u
(
sm
3
u
cm
3
u
−
1
)
cm
9
u
+
3
cm
6
u
−
6
cm
3
u
+
1
.
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\operatorname {cm} 2u&={\frac {\operatorname {cm} ^{3}u-\operatorname {sm} ^{3}u}{\operatorname {cm} u(1+\operatorname {sm} ^{3}u)}}={\frac {2\operatorname {cm} ^{3}u-1}{2\operatorname {cm} u-\operatorname {cm} ^{4}u}},\\[5mu]\operatorname {sm} 2u&={\frac {\operatorname {sm} u(1+\operatorname {cm} ^{3}u)}{\operatorname {cm} u(1+\operatorname {sm} ^{3}u)}}={\frac {2\operatorname {sm} u-\operatorname {sm} ^{4}u}{2\operatorname {cm} u-\operatorname {cm} ^{4}u}},\\[5mu]\operatorname {cm} 3u&={\frac {\operatorname {cm} ^{9}u-6\operatorname {cm} ^{6}u+3\operatorname {cm} ^{3}u+1}{\operatorname {cm} ^{9}u+3\operatorname {cm} ^{6}u-6\operatorname {cm} ^{3}u+1}},\\[5mu]\operatorname {sm} 3u&={\frac {3\operatorname {sm} u\,\operatorname {cm} u(\operatorname {sm} ^{3}u\,\operatorname {cm} ^{3}u-1)}{\operatorname {cm} ^{9}u+3\operatorname {cm} ^{6}u-6\operatorname {cm} ^{3}u+1}}.\end{aligned}}}
From these formulas it can be deduced that expressions in form
cm
(
k
π
3
2
n
3
m
)
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cm} ({\frac {k\pi _{3}}{2^{n}3^{m}}})}
and
sm
(
k
π
3
2
n
3
m
)
{\displaystyle \operatorname {sm} ({\frac {k\pi _{3}}{2^{n}3^{m}}})}
are either signless infinities , or origami-constructibles for any
n
,
m
,
k
∈
N
{\displaystyle n,m,k\in \mathbb {N} }
(In this paragraph,
M
=
{\displaystyle \mathbb {M} =}
set of all origami-constructibles
∪
{
∞
}
{\displaystyle \cup \{\infty }\}
). Because by finding
cm
(
x
2
)
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cm} ({\frac {x}{2}})}
, quartic or lesser degree in some cases equation has to be solved as seen from duplication formula which means that if
cm
x
∈
M
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cm} x\in \mathbb {M} }
, then
cm
(
x
2
)
∈
M
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cm} ({\frac {x}{2}})\in \mathbb {M} }
. To find one-third of argument value of cm, equation which is reductible to cubic or lesser degree in some cases by variable exchange
t
=
x
3
{\displaystyle t=x^{3}}
has to be solved as seen from triplication formula from that follows: if
cm
x
∈
M
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cm} x\in \mathbb {M} }
then
cm
(
x
3
)
∈
M
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cm} ({\frac {x}{3}})\in \mathbb {M} }
is true. Statement
cm
x
∈
M
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cm} x\in \mathbb {M} }
⇒
{\displaystyle \Rightarrow }
cm
(
n
x
)
∈
M
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cm} (nx)\in \mathbb {M} }
is true, because any multiple argument formula is a rational function . If
cm
x
∈
M
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cm} x\in \mathbb {M} }
, then
sm
x
∈
M
{\displaystyle \operatorname {sm} x\in \mathbb {M} }
because
sm
x
=
ω
p
1
−
cm
3
x
3
{\displaystyle \operatorname {sm} x=\omega ^{p}\,{\sqrt[{3}]{1-\operatorname {cm} ^{3}x}}}
where
p
∈
{
0
,
1
,
2
}
{\displaystyle p\in \{0,1,2\}}
.
Specific value identities [ edit ]
The
cm
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cm} }
function satisfies the identities
cm
2
9
π
3
=
−
cm
1
9
π
3
cm
4
9
π
3
,
cm
1
4
π
3
=
cl
1
3
ϖ
,
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\operatorname {cm} {\tfrac {2}{9}}\pi _{3}&=-\operatorname {cm} {\tfrac {1}{9}}\pi _{3}\,\operatorname {cm} {\tfrac {4}{9}}\pi _{3},\\[5mu]\operatorname {cm} {\tfrac {1}{4}}\pi _{3}&=\operatorname {cl} {\tfrac {1}{3}}\varpi ,\end{aligned}}}
where
cl
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cl} }
is lemniscate cosine and
ϖ
{\displaystyle \varpi }
is Lemniscate constant .[citation needed ]
The cm and sm functions can be approximated for
|
z
|
<
1
3
π
3
{\displaystyle |z|<{\tfrac {1}{3}}\pi _{3}}
by the Taylor series
cm
z
=
c
0
+
c
1
z
3
+
c
2
z
6
+
c
3
z
9
+
⋯
+
c
n
z
3
n
+
⋯
sm
z
=
s
0
z
+
s
1
z
4
+
s
2
z
7
+
s
3
z
10
+
⋯
+
s
n
z
3
n
+
1
+
⋯
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\operatorname {cm} z&=c_{0}+c_{1}z^{3}+c_{2}z^{6}+c_{3}z^{9}+\cdots +c_{n}z^{3n}+\cdots \\[4mu]\operatorname {sm} z&=s_{0}z+s_{1}z^{4}+s_{2}z^{7}+s_{3}z^{10}+\cdots +s_{n}z^{3n+1}+\cdots \end{aligned}}}
whose coefficients satisfy the recurrence
c
0
=
s
0
=
1
,
{\displaystyle c_{0}=s_{0}=1,}
[ 10]
c
n
=
−
1
3
n
∑
k
=
0
n
−
1
s
k
s
n
−
1
−
k
s
n
=
1
3
n
+
1
∑
k
=
0
n
c
k
c
n
−
k
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}c_{n}&=-{\frac {1}{3n}}\sum _{k=0}^{n-1}s_{k}s_{n-1-k}\\[4mu]s_{n}&={\frac {1}{3n+1}}\sum _{k=0}^{n}c_{k}c_{n-k}\end{aligned}}}
These recurrences result in:[ 11]
cm
z
=
1
−
1
3
z
3
+
1
18
z
6
−
23
2268
z
9
+
25
13608
z
12
−
619
1857492
z
15
+
⋯
sm
z
=
z
−
1
6
z
4
+
2
63
z
7
−
13
2268
z
10
+
23
22113
z
13
−
2803
14859936
z
16
+
⋯
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\operatorname {cm} z&=1-{\frac {1}{3}}z^{3}+{\frac {1}{18}}z^{6}-{\frac {23}{2268}}z^{9}+{\frac {25}{13608}}z^{12}-{\frac {619}{1857492}}z^{15}+\cdots \\[8mu]\operatorname {sm} z&=z-{\frac {1}{6}}z^{4}+{\frac {2}{63}}z^{7}-{\frac {13}{2268}}z^{10}+{\frac {23}{22113}}z^{13}-{\frac {2803}{14859936}}z^{16}+\cdots \end{aligned}}}
Relation to other elliptic functions [ edit ]
Weierstrass elliptic function [ edit ]
Elliptic curve
y
2
=
4
x
3
−
1
27
{\displaystyle y^{2}=4x^{3}-{\tfrac {1}{27}}}
for the Weierstrass ℘-function
z
↦
℘
(
z
;
0
,
1
27
)
{\displaystyle z\mapsto \wp {\bigl (}z;0,{\tfrac {1}{27}}{\bigr )}}
related to the Dixon elliptic functions.
The equianharmonic Weierstrass elliptic function
℘
(
z
)
=
℘
(
z
;
0
,
1
27
)
,
{\displaystyle \wp (z)=\wp {\bigl (}z;0,{\tfrac {1}{27}}{\bigr )},}
with lattice
Λ
=
π
3
Z
⊕
π
3
ω
Z
{\displaystyle \Lambda =\pi _{3}\mathbb {Z} \oplus \pi _{3}\omega \mathbb {Z} }
a scaling of the Eisenstein integers, can be defined as:[ 12]
℘
(
z
)
=
1
z
2
+
∑
λ
∈
Λ
∖
{
0
}
(
1
(
z
−
λ
)
2
−
1
λ
2
)
{\displaystyle \wp (z)={\frac {1}{z^{2}}}+\sum _{\lambda \in \Lambda \setminus \{0\}}\!\left({\frac {1}{(z-\lambda )^{2}}}-{\frac {1}{\lambda ^{2}}}\right)}
The function
℘
(
z
)
{\displaystyle \wp (z)}
solves the differential equation:
℘
′
(
z
)
2
=
4
℘
(
z
)
3
−
1
27
{\displaystyle \wp '(z)^{2}=4\wp (z)^{3}-{\tfrac {1}{27}}}
We can also write it as the inverse of the integral:
z
=
∫
∞
℘
(
z
)
d
w
4
w
3
−
1
27
{\displaystyle z=\int _{\infty }^{\wp (z)}{\frac {dw}{\sqrt {4w^{3}-{\tfrac {1}{27}}}}}}
In terms of
℘
(
z
)
{\displaystyle \wp (z)}
, the Dixon elliptic functions can be written:[ 13]
cm
z
=
3
℘
′
(
z
)
+
1
3
℘
′
(
z
)
−
1
,
sm
z
=
−
6
℘
(
z
)
3
℘
′
(
z
)
−
1
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cm} z={\frac {3\wp '(z)+1}{3\wp '(z)-1}},\ \operatorname {sm} z={\frac {-6\wp (z)}{3\wp '(z)-1}}}
Likewise, the Weierstrass elliptic function
℘
(
z
)
=
℘
(
z
;
0
,
1
27
)
{\displaystyle \wp (z)=\wp {\bigl (}z;0,{\tfrac {1}{27}}{\bigr )}}
can be written in terms of Dixon elliptic functions:
℘
′
(
z
)
=
cm
z
+
1
3
(
cm
z
−
1
)
,
℘
(
z
)
=
−
sm
z
3
(
cm
z
−
1
)
{\displaystyle \wp '(z)={\frac {\operatorname {cm} z+1}{3(\operatorname {cm} z-1)}},\ \wp (z)={\frac {-\operatorname {sm} z}{3(\operatorname {cm} z-1)}}}
Jacobi elliptic functions [ edit ]
The Dixon elliptic functions can also be expressed using Jacobi elliptic functions , which was first observed by Cayley .[ 14] Let
k
=
e
5
i
π
/
6
{\displaystyle k=e^{5i\pi /6}}
,
θ
=
3
1
4
e
5
i
π
/
12
{\displaystyle \theta =3^{\frac {1}{4}}e^{5i\pi /12}}
,
s
=
sn
(
u
,
k
)
{\displaystyle s=\operatorname {sn} (u,k)}
,
c
=
cn
(
u
,
k
)
{\displaystyle c=\operatorname {cn} (u,k)}
, and
d
=
dn
(
u
,
k
)
{\displaystyle d=\operatorname {dn} (u,k)}
. Then, let
ξ
(
u
)
=
−
1
+
θ
s
c
d
1
+
θ
s
c
d
{\displaystyle \xi (u)={\frac {-1+\theta scd}{1+\theta scd}}}
,
η
(
u
)
=
2
1
/
3
(
1
+
θ
2
s
2
)
1
+
θ
s
c
d
{\displaystyle \eta (u)={\frac {2^{1/3}\left(1+\theta ^{2}s^{2}\right)}{1+\theta scd}}}
.
Finally, the Dixon elliptic functions are as so:
sm
(
z
)
=
ξ
(
z
+
π
3
/
6
2
1
/
3
θ
)
{\displaystyle \operatorname {sm} (z)=\xi \left({\frac {z+\pi _{3}/6}{2^{1/3}\theta }}\right)}
,
cm
(
z
)
=
η
(
z
+
π
3
/
6
2
1
/
3
θ
)
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cm} (z)=\eta \left({\frac {z+\pi _{3}/6}{2^{1/3}\theta }}\right)}
.
Generalized trigonometry [ edit ]
Several definitions of generalized trigonometric functions include the usual trigonometric sine and cosine as an
n
=
2
{\displaystyle n=2}
case, and the functions sm and cm as an
n
=
3
{\displaystyle n=3}
case.[ 15]
For example, defining
π
n
=
B
(
1
n
,
1
n
)
{\displaystyle \pi _{n}=\mathrm {B} {\bigl (}{\tfrac {1}{n}},{\tfrac {1}{n}}{\bigr )}}
and
sin
n
z
,
cos
n
z
{\displaystyle \sin _{n}z,\,\cos _{n}z}
the inverses of an integral:
z
=
∫
0
sin
n
z
d
w
(
1
−
w
n
)
(
n
−
1
)
/
n
=
∫
cos
n
z
1
d
w
(
1
−
w
n
)
(
n
−
1
)
/
n
{\displaystyle z=\int _{0}^{\sin _{n}z}{\frac {dw}{(1-w^{n})^{(n-1)/n}}}=\int _{\cos _{n}z}^{1}{\frac {dw}{(1-w^{n})^{(n-1)/n}}}}
The area in the positive quadrant under the curve
x
n
+
y
n
=
1
{\displaystyle x^{n}+y^{n}=1}
is
∫
0
1
(
1
−
x
n
)
1
/
n
d
x
=
π
n
2
n
{\displaystyle \int _{0}^{1}(1-x^{n})^{1/n}\mathop {dx} ={\frac {\pi _{n}}{2n}}}
.
The quartic
n
=
4
{\displaystyle n=4}
case results in a square lattice in the complex plane, related to the lemniscate elliptic functions .
A conformal map projection of the globe onto an octahedron. Because the octahedron has equilateral triangle faces, this projection can be described in terms of sm and cm functions.
The Dixon elliptic functions are conformal maps from an equilateral triangle to a disk, and are therefore helpful for constructing polyhedral conformal map projections involving equilateral triangles, for example projecting the sphere onto a triangle, hexagon, tetrahedron , octahedron, or icosahedron.[ 16]
^ Dixon (1890), Dillner (1873). Dillner uses the symbols
W
=
sm
,
W
1
=
cm
.
{\displaystyle W=\operatorname {sm} ,\ W_{1}=\operatorname {cm} .}
^ Dixon (1890), Van Fossen Conrad & Flajolet (2005), Robinson (2019).
^ The mapping for a general regular polygon is described in Schwarz (1869).
^ van Fossen Conrad & Flajolet (2005) p. 6.
^ Dillner (1873) calls the period
3
w
{\displaystyle 3w}
. Dixon (1890) calls it
3
λ
{\displaystyle 3\lambda }
; Adams (1925) and Robinson (2019) each call it
3
K
{\displaystyle 3K}
. Van Fossen Conrad & Flajolet (2005) call it
π
3
{\displaystyle \pi _{3}}
. Also see OEIS A197374 .
^ Dixon (1890), Van Fossen Conrad & Flajolet (2005)
^ Dark areas represent zeros, and bright areas represent poles. As the argument of
sm
z
{\displaystyle \operatorname {sm} z}
goes from
−
π
{\displaystyle -\pi }
to
π
{\displaystyle \pi }
, the colors go through cyan, blue (
Arg
≈
−
π
/
2
{\displaystyle \operatorname {Arg} \approx -\pi /2}
), magneta, red (
Arg
≈
0
{\displaystyle \operatorname {Arg} \approx 0}
), orange, yellow (
Arg
≈
π
/
2
{\displaystyle \operatorname {Arg} \approx \pi /2}
), green, and back to cyan (
Arg
≈
π
{\displaystyle \operatorname {Arg} \approx \pi }
).
^ Dixon (1890), Adams (1925)
^ Dixon (1890), p. 185–186 . Robinson (2019).
^ Adams (1925)
^ van Fossen Conrad & Flajolet (2005). Also see OEIS A104133 , A104134 .
^ Reinhardt & Walker (2010)
^ Chapling (2018), Robinson (2019). Adams (1925) instead expresses the Dixon elliptic functions in terms of the Weierstrass elliptic function
℘
(
z
;
0
,
−
1
)
.
{\displaystyle \wp (z;0,-1).}
^ van Fossen Conrad & Flajolet (2005), p.38
^ Lundberg (1879), Grammel (1948), Shelupsky (1959), Burgoyne (1964), Gambini, Nicoletti, & Ritelli (2021).
^ Adams (1925), Cox (1935), Magis (1938), Lee (1973), Lee (1976), McIlroy (2011), Chapling (2016).
O. S. Adams (1925). Elliptic functions applied to conformal world maps (No. 297). US Government Printing Office. ftp://ftp.library.noaa.gov/docs.lib/htdocs/rescue/cgs_specpubs/QB275U35no1121925.pdf
R. Bacher & P. Flajolet (2010) “Pseudo-factorials, elliptic functions, and continued fractions” The Ramanujan journal 21(1), 71–97. https://arxiv.org/pdf/0901.1379.pdf
A. Cayley (1882) “Reduction of
∫
d
x
/
(
1
−
x
3
)
2
/
3
{\textstyle \int dx/(1-x^{3}){}^{2/3}}
to elliptic integrals”. Messenger of Mathematics 11, 142–143. https://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/id/PPN599484047_0011?tify={%22pages%22:%5b146%5d}
F. D. Burgoyne (1964) “Generalized trigonometric functions”. Mathematics of Computation 18(86), 314–316. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2003310
A. Cayley (1883) “On the elliptic function solution of the equation x 3 + y 3 − 1 = 0 ”, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 4, 106–109. https://archive.org/details/proceedingsofcam4188083camb/page/106/
R. Chapling (2016) “Invariant Meromorphic Functions on the Wallpaper Groups”. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.05677
J. F. Cox (1935) “Répresentation de la surface entière de la terre dans une triangle équilatéral”, Bulletin de la Classe des Sciences, Académie Royale de Belgique 5e , 21, 66–71.
G. Dillner (1873) “Traité de calcul géométrique supérieur”, Chapter 16, Nova acta Regiae Societatis Scientiarum Upsaliensis, Ser. III 8, 94–102. https://archive.org/details/novaactaregiaeso38kung/page/94/
Dixon, A. C. (1890). "On the doubly periodic functions arising out of the curve x 3 + y 3 − 3αxy = 1 " . Quarterly Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics . XXIV : 167–233.
A. Dixon (1894) The elementary properties of the elliptic functions . MacMillian. https://archive.org/details/elempropellipt00dixorich/
Van Fossen Conrad, Eric; Flajolet, Philippe (2005). "The Fermat cubic, elliptic functions, continued fractions, and a combinatorial excursion". Séminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire . 54 : Art. B54g, 44. arXiv :math/0507268 . Bibcode :2005math......7268V . MR 2223029 .
A. Gambini, G. Nicoletti, & D. Ritelli (2021) “Keplerian trigonometry”. Monatshefte für Mathematik 195(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00605-021-01512-0
R. Grammel (1948) “Eine Verallgemeinerung der Kreis-und Hyperbelfunktionen”. Archiv der Mathematik 1(1), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02038206
J. C. Langer & D. A. Singer (2014) “The Trefoil”. Milan Journal of Mathematics 82(1), 161–182. https://case.edu/artsci/math/langer/jlpreprints/Trefoil.pdf
M. Laurent (1949) “Tables de la fonction elliptique de Dixon pour l’intervalle 0-0, 1030”. Bulletin de l’Académie Royale des Sciences de Belgique Classe des Sciences , 35, 439–450.
L. P. Lee (1973) “The Conformal Tetrahedric Projection with some Practical Applications”. The Cartographic Journal , 10(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1179/caj.1973.10.1.22
L. P. Lee (1976) Conformal Projections Based on Elliptic Functions . Toronto: B. V. Gutsell, York University. Cartographica Monographs No. 16. ISBN 0-919870-16-3 . Supplement No. 1 to The Canadian Cartographer 13 .
E. Lundberg (1879) “Om hypergoniometriska funktioner af komplexa variabla”. Manuscript, 1879. Translation by Jaak Peetre “On hypergoniometric functions of complex variables”. https://web.archive.org/web/20161024183030/http://www.maths.lth.se/matematiklu/personal/jaak/hypergf.ps
J. Magis (1938) “Calcul du canevas de la représentation conforme de la sphère entière dans un triangle équilatéral”. Bulletin Géodésique 59(1), 247–256. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029866
M. D. McIlroy (2011) “Wallpaper maps”. Dependable and Historic Computing . Springer. 358–375. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-24541-1_27
W. P. Reinhardt & P. L. Walker (2010) “Weierstrass Elliptic and Modular Functions”, NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions , §23.5(v). https://dlmf.nist.gov/23.5#v
P. L. Robinson (2019) “The Dixonian elliptic functions”. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.04296
H. A. Schwarz (1869) “Ueber einige Abbildungsaufgaben”. Crelles Journal 1869(70), 105–120. http://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1869.70.105
B. R. Seth & F. P. White (1934) “Torsion of beams whose cross-section is a regular polygon of n sides”. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , 30(2), 139. http://doi.org/10.1017/s0305004100016558
D. Shelupsky (1959) “A generalization of the trigonometric functions”. The American Mathematical Monthly 66(10), 879–884. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2309789