Digital Performance Right in Sound Recordings Act
Long title | Digital Performance Right in Sound Recordings Act of 1995 |
---|---|
Acronyms (colloquial) | DPRA |
Effective | Feb 1, 1996 |
Citations | |
Public law | Pub. L. No. 104-39, 109 Stat. 336 |
Statutes at Large | 109 Stat. 336 |
Codification | |
Acts amended | Copyright Act of 1976 |
Titles amended | 17 (Copyright) |
U.S.C. sections amended | 17 U.S.C. §§ 106, 114-115 |
Legislative history | |
| |
Major amendments | |
Digital Millennium Copyright Act |
The Digital Performance Right in Sound Recordings Act of 1995 (DPRA) is a United States Copyright law that grants owners of a copyright in sound recordings an exclusive right “to perform the copyrighted work publicly by means of a digital audio transmission.”[1] The DPRA was enacted in response to the absence of a performance right for sound recordings in the Copyright Act of 1976 and a fear that digital technology would stand in for sales of physical records.[2] The performance right for sound recordings under the DPRA is limited to transmissions over a digital transmission, so it is not as expansive as the performance right for other types of copyrighted works.[3] The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), enacted in 1998, modified the DPRA.
Three-tier System
[edit]The DPRA categorizes services under three tiers, based on the service’s potential impact on record sales.[4] First, non-subscription broadcast transmissions are exempt from requirements to pay license fees. Second, non-interactive Internet transmissions are required to pay a statutory license established by the Copyright Board. Third, Interactive Internet transmission services are required to negotiate a license agreement with the copyright holder.
The DMCA modified the requirement and framework for the statutory license.
Criticism
[edit]While the DPRA expanded the sound recording’s performance right, performers have still criticized the DPRA’s comparative inequity[5][6] because composers still have a much wider performance right than performers. Broadcast services have criticized the DPRA’s burden on webcasters, since the three-tiered system places a higher burden on the interactive Internet transmission services.[4] Both sides have criticized the convoluted structure of the DPRA.[7]
References
[edit]- ^ 17 U.S.C. § 106(6)
- ^ Martin, Rebecca (1996). "THE DIGITAL PERFORMANCE RIGHT IN THE SOUND RECORDINGS ACT OF 1995: CAN IT PROTECT U.S. SOUND RECORDING COPYRIGHT OWNERS IN A GLOBAL MARKET?". Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal. 14: 733.
- ^ Cohen, Julie; Lydia Loren; Ruth Okediji; Maureen O'Rourke (2006). Copyright in a Global Information Economy. New York, New York: Aspen. pp. 466–67. ISBN 0-7355-5612-1.
- ^ a b Myers, Kellen (2008). "The RIAA, the DMCA, and the Forgotten Few Webcasters: A Call for Change in Digital Copyright Royalties". Federal Communications Law Journal. 61: 439–40.
- ^ Reid, Amanda (2012). "The Power of Music: Applying First Amendment Scrutiny to Copyright Regulation of Internet Radio". Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal. 20: 233.
- ^ Sen, Shourin (2007). "The Denial of a General Performance Right in Sound Recordings: A Policy that Facilitates Our Democratic Civil Society?". Harvard Journal of Law and Technology. 21 (1): 262. SSRN 1072442.
- ^ Jackson, Matt (2003). "From Broadcast to Webcast: Copyright Law and Streaming Media". Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal. 11: 455.