Dalisi
Appearance
Dalisi | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chinese name | |||||||||
Chinese | 大理寺 | ||||||||
| |||||||||
Vietnamese name | |||||||||
Vietnamese | Đại lý tự | ||||||||
Manchu name | |||||||||
Manchu script | ᠪᡝᡳᡩᡝᠨ ᠪᡝ ᡨᡠᠸᠠᠨᠴᡳᡥᡳᠶᠠᡵᠠ ᠶᠠᠮᡠᠨ | ||||||||
Möllendorff | beiden be tuwancihiyara yamun |
Dalisi[1] (大理寺; variously interpreted as the Court of Judicature and Revision,[2] the Court of Judicial Review,[3] and the Office of Justice[4]) was the central government's judicial body in ancient China responsible for handling criminal cases.[5][6] It was also referred to as Jisi (棘寺) because interrogations of criminals sometimes took place under thorn trees.[7] Ancient Vietnam followed ancient China's precedent and also established a similar institution.
References
[edit]- ^ "The Relationship of "Humanity, Reason and Law" with Chinese Legal Traditions" (PDF). Shenyang Normal University. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2024-09-13. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
- ^ Wickes, Dean R. WickesDean R. (2019-10-24), "WANG Yongji", Eminent Chinese of the Qing Period, Berkshire Publishing Group, doi:10.1093/acref/9780190088019.001.0001/acref-9780190088019-e-699, ISBN 978-1-61472-033-1, retrieved 2024-11-17
- ^ "From the Imperial Capital to the Magistrate's Court: Judicial Practices in Imperial China". academic.oup.com. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
- ^ "CONTRACTS AS TOOLS TO PROMOTE MORALITY AND SOCIAL ORDER: THE TANG DYNASTY'S REGULATION OF CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIPS" (PDF). Tsinghua China Law Review. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2024-11-17. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
- ^ 北宋·王讜,《唐語林》(卷8):“大理則於棘下訊鞫其罪,所謂‘大司寇聽刑於棘木之下’。”
- ^ "古代大理寺名称及职能的演变 – 北京政法网". www.bj148.org. Archived from the original on 2024-11-17. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
- ^ 南宋·徐夢莘,《三朝北盟會編》(卷207):“初,飛在大理寺獄,未肯招狀,先是飛自郾陵回軍也,在一村寺中,與王貴、張憲、董先、王俊夜坐,移時不語,忽作聲曰:‘天下事竟如何?’眾皆不敢應,唯憲徐言曰:‘在相公處置耳。’既退,俊握先及貴手曰:‘太尉,太尉聞適來相公之言及張太尉之對否?’先與貴曰:‘然。’及俊告飛使子雲通書軍中事,因言郾陵路中之語,舊校云:王俊首武穆反狀,《揮塵餘話》載之最詳,追先赴行在,秦檜與先曰:‘止是有一句言語要爾爲證,證了只今日便可出。’仍差大理官二人送先赴大理寺,並命證畢,就今日摘出,繇是先下大理寺對吏,即伏,吏問飛,飛猶不伏,有獄子事飛甚謹,至是獄子倚門斜立無恭謹之狀,飛異之,獄子忽然而言曰:‘我平生以岳飛爲忠臣,故伏侍甚謹,不敢少慢,今乃逆臣耳!’飛聞之,請問其故,獄子曰:‘君臣不可疑,疑則爲亂,故君疑臣則誅,臣疑君則反,若臣疑於君不反,復爲君疑而誅之,若君疑於臣而不誅,則復疑於君而必反。君今疑臣矣,故送下棘寺,豈有復出之理?死故無疑矣!少保若不死出獄,則復疑於君,安得不反?反既明甚,此所以爲逆臣也!’”
- Hucker, Charles O. (1985). A Dictionary of Official Titles in Imperial China. Stanford University Press. p. 468.