Jump to content

Copaganda

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Henderson Police Department cruiser next to a police promotional tent at the 2020 Nevada Law Enforcement Appreciation Day event

Copaganda (a portmanteau of cop and propaganda) is propaganda efforts to shape public opinion about police or counter criticism of police and anti-police sentiment.[1][2]

The term is mostly used in the United States, though also in other countries such as the United Kingdom, the Philippines, and Canada to criticize news media creating one-sided depictions of police, uncritically repeating police narratives, or minimizing police misconduct.[citation needed] It has also been applied to human interest stories and viral videos of cops performing wholesome activities in their communities.[citation needed]

Fictional depictions of police, especially in police procedurals and legal dramas, have been criticized for portraying police as infallible heroes and reinforcing misconceptions about crime rates, minority groups, and police misconduct.[3][4]

History

[edit]
Jack Webb (center, pointing) on the set of Dragnet, 1966. Many of Webb's works, including Dragnet, were endorsed and supported by the Los Angeles Police Department and were very pro-police, constituting an early form of copaganda.

Brenden Gallagher for The Daily Dot cites "saving kittens" stories and "Christmas gift surprise" stunts as "age-old versions of what we’re seeing today" and continues by stating that "Copaganda is so old, you can find it in Nick at Night reruns. The media has been regurgitating police PR since the days of Andy Griffith, and now in the era of Brooklyn 99, it is just being used more often and more effectively."[1]

Aaron Rahsaan Thomas comments on the history of copaganda in American television: "The past 60 years have seen shows like Dragnet (1951–1959), The Untouchables (1959–1963), and Adam 12 (1968–1975) establish a formula where, within an hour of story, good law men, also known as square-jawed white cops, defeat bad guys, often known as poor people of color." Subsequent shows such as Hawaii Five-O (1968–1980) and Kojak (1973–1978) solidified this narrative, along with Hill Street Blues (1981–1987), Miami Vice (1984–1989), and Cagney & Lacey (1982–1989), which were "for the most part, told from the point of view of white cops occasionally interacting with people of color who were, at best, one-dimensional criminals, colleagues, bosses, sidekicks, and best friends. Even when blackness was not equated with criminality, it was often supplemented by an inhuman lack of depth or presence."[5]

In 1979, historian E.P. Thompson drew attention to the phenomenon’s British manifestations. He observed a tendency towards the 'populist celebration of the servants of the state' exemplified on British television by the "homely neighbour and universal uncle, Dixon of Dock Green".[6]

In 2020, following the police murder of George Floyd and the resulting protests, audiences in the US and elsewhere demanded increased attention to how police were portrayed in crime shows and other media. This resulted in the cancellation of some programs such as the reality TV show Cops and A&E's Live PD.[7][8][9] Activists criticized videos of police officers kneeling with protestors as shallow gestures or performative displays of solidarity,[10] and some protestors claimed on social media that they were later attacked by the same police.[11] The media's focus on looting during the protests has also been described as copaganda.[citation needed]

Purpose

[edit]
A community policing event in Southend-on-Sea, England

The purpose of copaganda is to sway public opinion for the benefit of law enforcement and redirect attention away from news which may generate a negative image of law enforcement.[12] In an article for The New York Times on a viral video of a Norfolk Police Department lip-sync battle, reporter Laura Holson describes this as one example in a larger trend of "videos of officers performing [which] have gone viral across the country, as departments step up outreach efforts and seek to improve their image" and characterized it as a "public relations dance." Corporal William Pickering, a public information officer with the Norfolk Police Department, which created the 'Uptown Funk' video stated "it is allowing the country to see us in another way."[13]

Brenden Gallagher describes that the purpose of copaganda is to win a public relations battle: "If a disproportionate number of articles about the police engaging in 'random' acts of kindness pop up in your feed, while stories about police corruption or abuse are suppressed or go uncovered completely, the public perception of the police eventually looks far different than the reality."[1] According to an academic study on "Media Power & Information Control: A Study of Police Organizations & Media Relations" for the National Institute of Justice:

Most citizens have little contact with law enforcement officers and their opinion of the police is often formed by the mass media's portrayal of our functions. The maintenance of good press relations is therefore a crucial element of public relations. Officers and employees must maintain good rapport with the media and deal with them in a courteous and impartial manner. It must be remembered that the media has a legitimate function in our society and the public trust of the police can be enhanced through proper dealings with the media (#1098-5). The mission ... is (1) to coordinate the release of accurate and timely information to the news media and the public and (2) to promote the positive image of [the Department]. The goals of [the Department] are to maintain public support ... by keeping the avenues of communication among the department, news media and citizenry open. The objectives ... are to utilize the media when attempting to stimulate public interest in departmental programs involving the community [and to] promote a feeling of teamwork between the police and media (#3800). [Officers shall] assume a pro-active approach in contacting the news media with information about the Department that might not otherwise come to their attention, but is newsworthy (#302.3).[14]

Ronnie Boyd describes the role of copaganda as an attempt to divert the public's attention from racism and racist policing in America: "stories of Black folx being shot, murdered, sexually assaulted, and harassed by the police have flooded the airwaves since Black folx started building power to draw public attention. Since then, police departments across the country have worked hard to redirect our attention. One of their strategies is 'copaganda.'"[12] Copaganda media has been shown in a study to reinforce racist misconceptions.[4]

Examples

[edit]
A child petting a police dog at a Toronto Police Service open house event in 2019

News media are the most common outlets for copaganda, often taking the form of news stories about police officers performing simple tasks that can be construed as laudable by viewers.[1] Amidst the Ferguson unrest in 2014, a widely circulated news story and photographs of 12-year-old Devonte Hart hugging Portland Police Sergeant Bret Barnum, has been identified by critics as a prominent example of copaganda.[12] CBS News picked up the story in an article entitled "Amid Ferguson tension, emotional hug goes viral," with its opening line: "It's being called the hug felt 'round the world."[15]

In 2018, police lip-sync challenges received popular coverage in news media. USA Today called it "the hit social media trend of the summer" and created a bracket for police departments to submit videos of officers lip syncing to be voted on. The article stated that "nearly each of the lip sync videos that hits social media goes viral making everyone (viewer and video-maker alike) a winner."[16][17]

The National Law Enforcement Museum was described as "straight-up copaganda" in a review of the institution for The Washington Post, stating that it "leans more toward propaganda than education."[18]

News reporting often discusses police shootings in the passive voice, sometimes using the phrase "officer-involved shooting",[19] which has been described as a euphemism or a form of copaganda.[20][21] Such language obscures the role the police played in the interaction being described. In the case of "officer-involved shooting", it obscures how the officer was involved in the shooting.[22] This practice (also called the "past exonerative" tense)[23] is discouraged by NPR[20] and disallowed by the AP Stylebook in 2017.[22][24]

In February 2023, the city of Toronto spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on a podcast to present a "behind the scenes" view of policing in the city. They engaged a third-party producer to avoid the perception that the program was "copaganda", although the agency retained final say on the content of the podcast.[25] Reports or media produced by police agencies in Edmonton, Ottawa,[26] Vancouver,[27] and in relation to the 2022 convoy protests[28] have also been described as copaganda.

Copaganda in television

[edit]

Marga Buenaventura writing for CNN Philippines described the television series Ang Probinsyano as copaganda, drawing unfavorable comparisons between the series' favorable depiction of law enforcement and the various controversies involving the Philippine National Police such as corruption–particularly the padrino system–and various incidents of police brutality in the country.[29]

Reality shows that present police perspectives with a "bad guy" vs "good guy" narrative such as Cops and Live PD have been identified as a form of copaganda that minimizes the victim's side of the story. Such criticism led to the cancellation of Cops along with similar shows.[30] Cops was revived afterwards, with new episodes airing on the Fox Nation streaming service,[citation needed] while the Live PD concept returned to Reelz with most of its personnel as On Patrol: Live, which is currently subject to a copyright infringement lawsuit by A&E Networks.[citation needed]

TV franchises such as Law & Order, NCIS and FBI and shows such as Scandal, Major Crimes, Chicago PD, Blue Bloods, Hawaii Five-0, Criminal Minds, Magnum, P.I., S.W.A.T., and Rookie Blue have been described as "copagandic narratives", "outright applaud[ing] police" or "mindless glorification."[11][12][31] Dick Wolf, the producer of the Law & Order franchise, described himself as "unabashedly pro law enforcement."[32] In the wake of the protests, calls to cancel copaganda television shows entered the mainstream discourse.[32]

In the wake of the George Floyd protests, the Canadian animated children's series PAW Patrol was criticized for presenting a "good-cop archetype" after a post appeared on the show's Twitter account announcing that they would go dark in memory of Floyd received negative backlash.[33][34][35] In July 2020, then-White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany claimed the show was canceled due to "cancel culture"[36] but the show denied any such termination.[37]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d Gallagher, Brenden (28 February 2020). "Just say no to viral 'copaganda' videos". The Daily Dot. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
  2. ^ Karakatsanis, Alec (20 July 2022). "Police Departments Spend Vast Sums of Money Creating 'Copaganda'". Jacobin. Retrieved 1 November 2023.
  3. ^ Grady, Constance (12 April 2021). "How 70 years of cop shows taught us to valorize the police". Vox. Retrieved 21 October 2023.
  4. ^ a b Metz, Nina (13 February 2020). "Study shows TV like 'NCIS' reinforce misperceptions of race". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 21 October 2023.
  5. ^ Thomas, Aaron Rahsaan (8 June 2020). "Is TV Finally Done With 'Heroic' Cops? A Black Showrunner Says, 'Hell F*cking No'". Vanity Fair. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
  6. ^ Thompson, E.P. (1 January 1979). "The Secret State". Race & Class. 20 (3): 219–242. doi:10.1177/030639687902000301. ISSN 0306-3968. S2CID 145620868. Retrieved 15 May 2021.
  7. ^ Frazer-Carroll, Micha (10 July 2020). "Copaganda: Why film and TV portrayals of the police are under fire". The Independent. Retrieved 1 November 2023.
  8. ^ Wilbur, Brock (10 June 2020). "The time has come to cancel 'copaganda' television, and it is long overdue". The Pitch. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
  9. ^ Schneider, Michael (10 June 2020). "A&E Canceling 'Live PD' Following Ongoing Protests Against Police Brutality". Variety. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
  10. ^ Adams, Kiersten (5 June 2020). "Copaganda: Why Cops Kneeling in Protest is not Solidarity, It's Problematic". Blavity. Retrieved 8 November 2023.
  11. ^ a b Walker, Chris (1 June 2020). "Police Attacked Protesters After Kneeling for 'Solidarity' Photo Op, Activists Say". Truthout. Retrieved 30 April 2023.
  12. ^ a b c d Boyd, Ronnie (5 January 2018). "Netflix's 'Bright' is copaganda, plain and simple". Afropunk.
  13. ^ Holson, Laura M. (23 July 2018). "Police Officers Lip-Sync as Part of Public Relations Dance". The New York Times. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
  14. ^ Lovell, Jarret S. (2002). "Media Power & Information Control: A Study of Police Organizations & Media Relations" (PDF). The National Institute of Justice. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 June 2023.
  15. ^ "Amid Ferguson tension, emotional hug goes viral". CBS News. CBS/AP. 29 November 2014. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
  16. ^ Scanlan, Sarah (24 August 2018). "Lip sync challenge: Police battle best songs in this video bracket". USA Today. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
  17. ^ Grasso, Samantha (27 August 2018). "Police are competing for the 'best' viral lip sync challenge in the nation". The Daily Dot. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
  18. ^ Dingfelder, Sadie (7 February 2019). "The new National Law Enforcement Museum is straight-up copaganda". The Washington Post. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
  19. ^ Ciccariello-Maher, George (2021). A World Without Police: How Strong Communities Make Cops Obsolete. London: Verso Books. p. 35. ISBN 9781839760075. Retrieved 1 June 2022.
  20. ^ a b Memmott, Mark (7 July 2016). "Recommended Listening: Why Not To Use The Phrase "Officer-involved Shooting"". NPR. Retrieved 1 June 2022.
  21. ^ Frazier, Mya (7 August 2020). "Stop using 'officer-involved shooting'". Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved 1 June 2022.
  22. ^ a b Soderberg, Brandon; Friedman, Andy (13 January 2022). "Major Media Outlets Can't Stop Describing Police Violence As 'Officer-Involved' Incidents". HuffPost. Retrieved 1 June 2022.
  23. ^ Malone, Emerson (4 May 2023). "We Need To Abolish The 'Exonerative Tense' Of Headlines". BuzzFeed News. Retrieved 21 October 2023.
  24. ^ Iannelli, Jerry (12 October 2021). "Why the Media Won't Stop Using 'Officer-Involved Shootings'". The Appeal. Retrieved 1 June 2022.
  25. ^ Rieti, John; Jeffords, Shawn (14 February 2023). "Toronto police spending $337K on a podcast to avoid perception they're making 'copaganda'". CBC.ca. Retrieved 1 November 2023.
  26. ^ Johal, Rumneek (8 December 2022). "Police across Canada are investing in 'copaganda' reports that criticize the social safety net". PressProgress. Retrieved 1 November 2023.
  27. ^ St. Denis, Jen (9 November 2022). "'Copaganda': Critics Challenge Police Report on Social Spending". The Tyee. Retrieved 1 November 2023.
  28. ^ Salutin, Rick (28 October 2022). "Rick Salutin: From 'copaganda' to the convoy inquiry: Lessons to be learned". Toronto Star. Retrieved 1 November 2023.
  29. ^ Buenaventura, Marga (10 August 2021). "Why are we still watching copaganda?". CNN Philippines. Archived from the original on 1 November 2023. Retrieved 1 November 2023.
  30. ^ Leidy, Josh (9 December 2020). "Copaganda: An Introduction to How Media Affects Our Perception of Policing and Criminal Justice". Cinespeak. Retrieved 13 April 2023.
  31. ^ Joseph, Funké (5 March 2019). "The Complications of Liking 'Brooklyn Nine-Nine' as a Black Man". Vice.
  32. ^ a b "Law & Order". Last Week Tonight with John Oliver. HBO. 12 September 2022. Retrieved 3 February 2023 – via YouTube.
  33. ^ PAW Patrol [@pawpatrol] (2 June 2020). "In solidarity of #amplifymelanatedvoices we will be muting our content until June 7th to give access for Black voices to be heard so we can continue to listen and further our learning. #amplifyblackvoices" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  34. ^ Subramaniam, Tara (24 July 2020). "Fact Check: Despite White House claims, PAW Patrol and police LEGO have not been canceled". CNN. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 24 August 2020.
  35. ^ Platzer, Brian (24 July 2020). "Paw Patrol Is Contemptible Trash". Vulture. Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 24 August 2020.
  36. ^ Trepany, Charles. "Kayleigh McEnany decries cancellation of 'PAW Patrol'; Nickelodeon says show isn't canceled". USA Today. Archived from the original on 11 January 2021. Retrieved 16 November 2020.
  37. ^ PAW Patrol [@pawpatrol] (24 July 2020). "No need to worry. PAW Patrol is not canceled" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Copaganda&oldid=1255270167"