Jump to content

Convex analysis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A 3-dimensional convex polytope. Convex analysis includes not only the study of convex subsets of Euclidean spaces but also the study of convex functions on abstract spaces.

Convex analysis is the branch of mathematics devoted to the study of properties of convex functions and convex sets, often with applications in convex minimization, a subdomain of optimization theory.

Convex sets

[edit]

A subset of some vector space is convex if it satisfies any of the following equivalent conditions:

  1. If is real and then [1]
  2. If is real and with then
Convex function on an interval.

Throughout, will be a map valued in the extended real numbers with a domain that is a convex subset of some vector space. The map is a convex function if

(Convexity ≤)

holds for any real and any with If this remains true of when the defining inequality (Convexity ≤) is replaced by the strict inequality

(Convexity <)

then is called strictly convex.[1]

Convex functions are related to convex sets. Specifically, the function is convex if and only if its epigraph

A function (in black) is convex if and only if its epigraph, which is the region above its graph (in green), is a convex set.
A graph of the bivariate convex function
(Epigraph def.)

is a convex set.[2] The epigraphs of extended real-valued functions play a role in convex analysis that is analogous to the role played by graphs of real-valued function in real analysis. Specifically, the epigraph of an extended real-valued function provides geometric intuition that can be used to help formula or prove conjectures.

The domain of a function is denoted by while its effective domain is the set[2]

(dom f def.)

The function is called proper if and for all [2] Alternatively, this means that there exists some in the domain of at which and is also never equal to In words, a function is proper if its domain is not empty, it never takes on the value and it also is not identically equal to If is a proper convex function then there exist some vector and some such that

    for every

where denotes the dot product of these vectors.

Convex conjugate

[edit]

The convex conjugate of an extended real-valued function (not necessarily convex) is the function from the (continuous) dual space of and[3]

where the brackets denote the canonical duality The biconjugate of is the map defined by for every If denotes the set of -valued functions on then the map defined by is called the Legendre-Fenchel transform.

Subdifferential set and the Fenchel-Young inequality

[edit]

If and then the subdifferential set is

For example, in the important special case where is a norm on , it can be shown[proof 1] that if then this definition reduces down to:

    and    

For any and which is called the Fenchel-Young inequality. This inequality is an equality (i.e. ) if and only if It is in this way that the subdifferential set is directly related to the convex conjugate

Biconjugate

[edit]

The biconjugate of a function is the conjugate of the conjugate, typically written as The biconjugate is useful for showing when strong or weak duality hold (via the perturbation function).

For any the inequality follows from the Fenchel–Young inequality. For proper functions, if and only if is convex and lower semi-continuous by Fenchel–Moreau theorem.[3][4]

Convex minimization

[edit]

A convex minimization (primal) problem is one of the form

find when given a convex function and a convex subset

Dual problem

[edit]

In optimization theory, the duality principle states that optimization problems may be viewed from either of two perspectives, the primal problem or the dual problem.

In general given two dual pairs separated locally convex spaces and Then given the function we can define the primal problem as finding such that

If there are constraint conditions, these can be built into the function by letting where is the indicator function. Then let be a perturbation function such that [5]

The dual problem with respect to the chosen perturbation function is given by

where is the convex conjugate in both variables of

The duality gap is the difference of the right and left hand sides of the inequality[6][5][7]

This principle is the same as weak duality. If the two sides are equal to each other, then the problem is said to satisfy strong duality.

There are many conditions for strong duality to hold such as:

Lagrange duality

[edit]

For a convex minimization problem with inequality constraints,

subject to for

the Lagrangian dual problem is

subject to for

where the objective function is the Lagrange dual function defined as follows:

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell (1997) [1970]. Convex Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-01586-6.
  2. ^ a b c Rockafellar & Wets 2009, pp. 1–28.
  3. ^ a b Zălinescu 2002, pp. 75–79.
  4. ^ Borwein, Jonathan; Lewis, Adrian (2006). Convex Analysis and Nonlinear Optimization: Theory and Examples (2 ed.). Springer. pp. 76–77. ISBN 978-0-387-29570-1.
  5. ^ a b Boţ, Radu Ioan; Wanka, Gert; Grad, Sorin-Mihai (2009). Duality in Vector Optimization. Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-02885-4.
  6. ^ Zălinescu 2002, pp. 106–113.
  7. ^ Csetnek, Ernö Robert (2010). Overcoming the failure of the classical generalized interior-point regularity conditions in convex optimization. Applications of the duality theory to enlargements of maximal monotone operators. Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH. ISBN 978-3-8325-2503-3.
  8. ^ Borwein, Jonathan; Lewis, Adrian (2006). Convex Analysis and Nonlinear Optimization: Theory and Examples (2 ed.). Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-29570-1.
  9. ^ Boyd, Stephen; Vandenberghe, Lieven (2004). Convex Optimization (PDF). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-83378-3. Retrieved October 3, 2011.
  1. ^ The conclusion is immediate if so assume otherwise. Fix Replacing with the norm gives If and is real then using gives where in particular, taking gives while taking gives and thus ; moreover, if in addition then because it follows from the definition of the dual norm that Because which is equivalent to it follows that which implies for all From these facts, the conclusion can now be reached. ∎

References

[edit]
[edit]