Jump to content

Clinical empathy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Clinical empathy is expressed as the skill of understanding what a patient says and feels, and effectively communicating this understanding to the patient.[1] The opposite of clinical empathy is clinical detachment. Detached concern, or clinical detachment, is the ability to distance oneself from the patient in order to serve the patient from an objective standpoint.[2] For physicians to maximize their role as providers, a balance must be developed between clinical detachment and clinical empathy.[3]

In 2001, an instrument was created to measure a physician's empathy towards each patient. This tool is called the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy.[4] The 20-item questionnaire was originally developed for administration to medical students and physicians but has extended to dentistry and nursing because it is easy to interpret, administer, and analyze.[5][6]

From a student's first year to their fourth year in medical school, empathy scores on the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (S-version) decrease.[7] Both gender and specialty choice affect empathy scores, favoring women and primary care specialties.[8]

Clinical empathy

[edit]

Clinical empathy is a main component of the patient-provider relationship. It is seen as a commonly accepted pillar of professionalism for medical students.[9] Empathy involves both cognitive and affective aspects.[10] The cognitive domain revolves around understanding a patient's experiences and being able to understand the world from their point of view. This contrasts the affective aspect of empathy which involves joining in the patient's emotional experiences and feelings, which correlates closer to sympathy.[4] Empathetic physicians share understanding with patients, which serves to benefit the patient in their physical, mental and social well-being. Both a provider's ability to provide empathetic care as well as a perception of this care by the patient are important in diagnosis and treatment.[11] Developing the ability to understand a patient's thoughts and feelings lends itself to a successful medical interview and collaborative treatment.[12] Practicing empathy in a clinical setting leads to greater patient satisfaction,[13] better compliance,[14] and fewer lawsuits.[15]

Clinical detachment

[edit]

Clinical detachment is a means of providing objective, detached medical care while maintaining enough concern for the patient to offer emotional understanding.[16] A close patient-provider relationship threatens objectivity, therefore a social distance is expected to ensure professionalism.[17] Students in medical school are taught clinical detachment as a protective mechanism for dealing with emotional experiences such as death and dying.[18] Clinical detachment is also a means of dealing with the pressure of making mistakes[19] and medical uncertainty.[20] Suppression and repression of emotions, intellectualization, and humor are mechanisms used to confront distressing situations in order to give an objective assessment.[21]

Jefferson Medical College Main Building 132 S. 10th Street

Measurement

[edit]

Because empathy is a multi-faceted and complex concept, measurement proves to be difficult.[22] Although there are scales to measure empathy such as the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, developed by Davis, the Emotional Empathy Scale, developed by Mehrabian and Epstein, and the Hogan Empathy Scale, they were not created explicitly to measure physician empathy. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy was created at the Center for Research in Medical Education and Health Care (CRMEHC) at Jefferson Medical College to measure patient perceptions of empathy from their provider. Construct validity, criterion-related validity, predictive validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability all provide empirical support for the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy.[23] The scale was originally intended for distribution to medical students and physicians.[4] Since its creation, it has been translated into 53 languages[24] and applied to other medical professions such as dentistry and nursing.[5] Three versions of the scale now exist, one for medical students (S-version), one for health professions (HP-version), and one for health professions students (HPS-version).[24] Results of the 20 item questionnaire provide that higher scores are related to higher levels of empathy in interpersonal care.

Role in medical education

[edit]

Medical students' first experience with a patient is often with a cadaver in a gross anatomy course. Working intimately with a cadaver during a gross anatomy course captures the essence of the patient-provider relationship.[25] Cadaver dissection is a challenging emotional and mental experience. Involvement, emotional coping, and ability are three themes that develop during the dissection experience.[26] Medical students in a gross anatomy course may experience mixed emotions and variable reactions to cadaver dissection. Students who view their donor as a scientific specimen are less opposed to dissection, whereas students who view their donor as a former living person face greater difficulty with dissection and foster feelings of empathy towards the cadaver.[27] Because of the emotional impact of dissection, students may develop detached concern to cope with these feelings.[28]

In western countries, medical education emphasizes a "body as first patient" philosophy for dissection.[29] This anonymizes cadavers which fosters a different relationship than in eastern countries. Many eastern countries adopt a mindset of donor as "first teacher". For example, in Thailand, students are encouraged to develop a personal relationship with their donors. The students are instructed to view their donors with the highest honor and view the cadavers as a "great teacher".[30] This intention allows medical students to form a relationship that is familiar to them, one of a teacher and student, as opposed to approaching their donor as a doctor, a practice that new and unfamiliar to students.[31] Although eastern and western countries handle cadaver relationships differently, it can be generalized that gross anatomy courses offer an opportunity for students to examine their feelings on life, death, and dying.[32] These courses also promote development of coping strategies for stressful situations.[29]

Over the course of medical education, males and females differ in their attitudes and execution of empathetic treatment. Students entering people-oriented specialties such as family medicine, general internal medicine, and other primary care specialties have higher scores on the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy, whereas students entering technology-oriented specialties such as pathology, radiology, and anesthesiology score lower on empathy.[8] Female students are more likely to enter people-oriented specialties whereas men are more likely to enter technology-oriented specialties.[12] Female students score higher than male students on the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy across all years of medical school education. Female students also have a greater likelihood than men to disagree with a need for detached concern in order to provide the best medical treatment.[33]

Several studies have indicated that clinical empathy may decline in students during medical school, with a change even being observed from the start to the end of first year.[34] If this is the case, there could be negative consequences, as it is feared that a reduction in empathy may affect professionalism and quality of care.

A recent study investigate the causes of the decline.[35] It seems that a "hidden curriculum" which includes a high workload, paucity of adequate role models, and lack of support can cause adaptations such as cynicism and detachment. In addition, the decrease may be due to the medical curriculum which may cause students to develop more of a scientific instead of a holistic approach to medicine.[36][37]). Another reason is that medical school is a competitive environment that can cause students to prioritise their performance in medical school, rather than maintaining a caring demeanour.[38] Similarly, it has also been suggested that as the pressure to obtain medical knowledge increases throughout medical school, students become more worried about retaining this knowledge alongside having to remain empathetic and caring towards patients. Students are more likely to lose their empathic qualities as compensation to allow them to still feel as though they are capable of learning all of the information they are required to.[39] Furthermore, as students’ progress through medical school, they may be more likely to dehumanise patients to protect themselves from feelings of distress as they encounter increasingly challenging patients. As a result their empathy for patients may suffer.[40]

Maintenance

[edit]

Many methods have been put forward which aim to maintain the empathy of healthcare students and professionals with varying success.[41] Interventions have included medical humanities and creative arts around a patient narrative, writing interventions including creative writing and blogging, drama, formal communication and inter-personal skills training and problem based learning.[41]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Olson, Joanne K. (December 1995). "Relationships Between Nurse-Expressed Empathy, Patient-Perceived Empathy and Patient Distress". Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 27 (4): 317–322. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.1995.tb00895.x. PMID 8530122.
  2. ^ Tseng, Wei-Ting; Lin, Ya-Ping (6 May 2016). "'Detached concern' of medical students in a cadaver dissection course: A phenomenological study". Anatomical Sciences Education. 9 (3): 265–271. doi:10.1002/ase.1579. PMID 26587913.
  3. ^ Body of Work: Meditations on Mortality from the Human Anatomy Lab. ISBN 978-1-4295-4753-6.[page needed]
  4. ^ a b c Hojat, Mohammadreza; Mangione, Salvatore; Nasca, Thomas J.; Cohen, Mitchell J. M.; Gonnella, Joseph S.; Erdmann, James B.; Veloski, Jon; Magee, Mike (2 July 2016). "The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: Development and Preliminary Psychometric Data". Educational and Psychological Measurement. 61 (2): 349–365. doi:10.1177/00131640121971158. S2CID 144762663.
  5. ^ a b Sherman, JJ; Cramer, A (March 2005). "Measurement of changes in empathy during dental school". Journal of Dental Education. 69 (3): 338–45. doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2005.69.3.tb03920.x. PMID 15749944.
  6. ^ Fields, Sylvia K.; Hojat, Mohammadreza; Gonnella, Joseph S.; Mangione, Salvatore; Kane, Gregory; Magee, Mike (22 June 2016). "Comparisons of Nurses and Physicians on an Operational Measure of Empathy". Evaluation & the Health Professions. 27 (1): 80–94. doi:10.1177/0163278703261206. PMID 14994561. S2CID 33787233.
  7. ^ Chen, Daniel; Lew, Robert; Hershman, Warren; Orlander, Jay (26 July 2007). "A Cross-sectional Measurement of Medical Student Empathy". Journal of General Internal Medicine. 22 (10): 1434–1438. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0298-x. PMC 2305857. PMID 17653807.
  8. ^ a b Hojat, Mohammadreza; Zuckerman, Marvin; Magee, Mike; Mangione, Salvatore; Nasca, Thomas; Vergare, Michael; Gonnella, Joseph S. (November 2005). "Empathy in medical students as related to specialty interest, personality, and perceptions of mother and father". Personality and Individual Differences. 39 (7): 1205–1215. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.007.
  9. ^ Veloski, J. Jon; Fields, Sylvia K.; Boex, James R.; Blank, Linda L. (April 2005). "Measuring Professionalism: A Review of Studies with Instruments Reported in the Literature between 1982 and 2002". Academic Medicine. 80 (4): 366–370. doi:10.1097/00001888-200504000-00014. PMID 15793022. S2CID 25491105.
  10. ^ Library Resource Finder: More Details for: Empathy : a social psychological approach. Brown & Benchmark Publishers. 1994-01-17. ISBN 978-0-697-16894-8. Retrieved 2016-03-23. {{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)
  11. ^ Glaser, Karen M.; Markham, Fred W.; Adler, Herbert M.; McManus, Patrick R.; Hojat, Mohammadreza (2007-07-01). "Relationships between scores on the Jefferson Scale of physician empathy, patient perceptions of physician empathy, and humanistic approaches to patient care: a validity study". Medical Science Monitor. 13 (7): CR291–294. PMID 17599021.
  12. ^ a b Hegazi, Iman; Wilson, Ian (19 June 2013). "Maintaining empathy in medical school: It is possible". Medical Teacher. 35 (12): 1002–1008. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.802296. PMID 23782049. S2CID 15910933.
  13. ^ Bertakis, KD; Roter, D; Putnam, SM (February 1991). "The relationship of physician medical interview style to patient satisfaction". The Journal of Family Practice. 32 (2): 175–81. PMID 1990046.
  14. ^ DiMatteo, M. Robin; Sherbourne, Cathy Donald; Hays, Ron D.; Ordway, Lynn; Kravitz, Richard L.; McGlynn, Elizabeth A.; Kaplan, Sherrie; Rogers, William H. (1993). "Physicians' characteristics influence patients' adherence to medical treatment: Results from the Medical Outcomes Study". Health Psychology. 12 (2): 93–102. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.12.2.93. PMID 8500445.
  15. ^ Beckman, Howard B. (27 June 1994). "The Doctor-Patient Relationship and Malpractice". Archives of Internal Medicine. 154 (12): 1365–70. doi:10.1001/archinte.1994.00420120093010. PMID 8002688.
  16. ^ Lief & Fox (1963). "Training for "detached concern" in medical students". The Psychological Basis of Medical Practice.
  17. ^ Kadushin, Charles (March 1962). "Social Distance Between Client and Professional". American Journal of Sociology. 67 (5): 517–531. doi:10.1086/223189. S2CID 144204312.
  18. ^ Fox, John (July 2016). "'Notice How You Feel': An Alternative to Detached Concern Among Hospice Volunteers". Qualitative Health Research. 16 (7): 944–961. doi:10.1177/1049732306290233. PMID 16894225. S2CID 27466286.
  19. ^ Bosk, Charles L. (2003-10-15). Forgive and Remember: Managing Medical Failure (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-06678-3.
  20. ^ Fox, Renée C. (1980-01-01). "The Evolution of Medical Uncertainty". The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society. 58 (1): 1–49. doi:10.2307/3349705. JSTOR 3349705. PMID 6903782.
  21. ^ Lief (1963). "Training for "detached concern" in medical students". The Psychological Basis of Medical Practice.
  22. ^ Alligood, Martha R.; May, Barbara A. (19 August 2016). "A Nursing Theory of Personal System Empathy: Interpreting a Conceptualization of Empathy in King's Interacting Systems". Nursing Science Quarterly. 13 (3): 243–247. doi:10.1177/08943180022107645. PMID 11847804. S2CID 43477474.
  23. ^ Fields, Sylvia K.; Mahan, Pamela; Tillman, Paula; Harris, Jeffrey; Maxwell, Kaye; Hojat, Mohammadreza (9 May 2011). "Measuring empathy in healthcare profession students using the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: Health provider – student version". Journal of Interprofessional Care. 25 (4): 287–293. doi:10.3109/13561820.2011.566648. PMID 21554061. S2CID 34221329.
  24. ^ a b "Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Thomas Jefferson University". www.jefferson.edu. Archived from the original on 2019-04-01. Retrieved 2016-03-15.
  25. ^ Aziz, M. Ashraf; Mckenzie, James C.; Wilson, James S.; Cowie, Robert J.; Ayeni, Sylvanus A.; Dunn, Barbara K. (15 February 2002). "The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics". The Anatomical Record. 269 (1): 20–32. doi:10.1002/ar.10046. PMID 11891622.
  26. ^ Madill, Anna; Latchford, Gary (April 2005). "Identity change and the human dissection experience over the first year of medical training" (PDF). Social Science & Medicine. 60 (7): 1637–1647. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.035. PMID 15652694. ProQuest 230467568.
  27. ^ Hafferty, Frederic W.; Hafferty, Associate Professor of Behavioral Sciences Frederic W. (1991). Into the valley : death and the socialization of medical students. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-05144-5.
  28. ^ Hildebrandt, Sabine (8 March 2010). "Developing empathy and clinical detachment during the dissection course in gross anatomy". Anatomical Sciences Education. 3 (4): 216. doi:10.1002/ase.145. hdl:2027.42/77510. PMID 20213694. S2CID 45575377.
  29. ^ a b Bertman, Sandra L.; Marks, S. C. (1985-09-01). "Humanities in medical education: rationale and resources for the dissection laboratory". Medical Education. 19 (5): 374–381. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1985.tb01340.x. PMID 4058336. S2CID 39127574.
  30. ^ Winkelmann, Andreas; Güldner, Fritz H (18 December 2004). "Cadavers as teachers: the dissecting room experience in Thailand". BMJ. 329 (7480): 1455–1457. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7480.1455. PMC 535977. PMID 15604182.
  31. ^ Bohl, Michael; Bosch, Peter; Hildebrandt, Sabine (July 2011). "Medical students' perceptions of the body donor as a 'First Patient' or 'Teacher': A pilot study". Anatomical Sciences Education. 4 (4): 208–213. doi:10.1002/ase.231. hdl:2027.42/87042. PMID 21618447. S2CID 22322454.
  32. ^ Coombs, Robert H. (1978-01-01). Mastering Medicine: Professional Socialization in Medical School. Free Press. ISBN 978-0-02-906640-9.
  33. ^ Dickinson, George E.; Lancaster, Carol J.; Winfield, Idee C.; Reece, Eleanor F.; Colthorpe, Christopher A. (1997). "Detached concern and death anxiety of first-year medical students: Before and after the gross anatomy course". Clinical Anatomy. 10 (3): 201–207. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1997)10:3<201::AID-CA5>3.0.CO;2-W. PMID 9135887. S2CID 25398679.
  34. ^ Neumann, Melanie; Edelhäuser, Friedrich; Tauschel, Diethard; Fischer, Martin R.; Wirtz, Markus; Woopen, Christiane; Haramati, Aviad; Scheffer, Christian (August 2011). "Empathy Decline and Its Reasons: A Systematic Review of Studies With Medical Students and Residents". Academic Medicine. 86 (8): 996–1009. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318221e615. PMID 21670661. S2CID 8641952.
  35. ^ Howick J, Dudko M, Feng SN, Ahmed A, Alluri N, Nockels K, Winter R, Holland R (April 2023). "Why might medical student empathy change throughout medical school? a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies". BMC Medical Education. 23 (270): 270. doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04165-9. PMC 10124056. PMID 37088814.
  36. ^ Artiran Igde, Fusun; Sahin, Mustafa Kursat (9 October 2017). "Changes in empathy during Medical Education: An example from Turkey". Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 33 (5): 1177–1181. doi:10.12669/pjms.335.13074. PMC 5673729. PMID 29142560.
  37. ^ Empathy decline and its reasons: a systematic review of studies with medical students and residents. Academic Medicine, 86(8), 996–1009.
  38. ^ MacLeod, Anna (25 December 2010). "Caring, competence and professional identities in medical education". Advances in Health Sciences Education. 16 (3): 375–394. doi:10.1007/s10459-010-9269-9. PMID 21188513. S2CID 36370998.
  39. ^ Good, Byron J.; Good, Mary-Jo DelVecchio (1993). "'Learning Medicine': The Constructing of Medical Knowledge at Harvard Medical School". Knowledge, Power and Practice: The Anthropology of Medicine and Everyday Life. pp. 81–107.
  40. ^ Werner, ER; Korsch, BM (March 1976). "The vulnerability of the medical student: posthumous presentation of L.L. Stephens' ideas". Pediatrics. 57 (3): 321–8. doi:10.1542/peds.57.3.321. PMID 768890. S2CID 40271431.
  41. ^ a b Batt-Rawden, Samantha A.; Chisolm, Margaret S.; Anton, Blair; Flickinger, Tabor E. (August 2013). "Teaching empathy to medical students: an updated, systematic review". Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 88 (8): 1171–1177. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318299f3e3. ISSN 1938-808X. PMID 23807099.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clinical_empathy&oldid=1221339302"