Category talk:YouTubers
This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Organisation
[edit]Surely this page should either have Full names or usernames and not a mixture of both?
If it is a mixture of both, consider moving people like egoraptor to E isntead of H for Hanson, seeing as this name is not displayed! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snowy1256 (talk • contribs) 22:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Criteria for inclusion
[edit]I think if this category is going to be used, then there should be much more clarity around who should and should not be included. What does it mean to be a "youtube personality"? Can you use youtube without being a "youtube personality"? Should you be on this list if you are not principally known for being on youtube? --ℕ ℱ 21:28, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- If someone has the majority of their income/notability from YouTube, then they should fit into this category. Someone who just happens to have a YouTube channel as a secondary outlet for their work doesn't count (in my mind). You wouldn't call Foo Fighters "YouTube personalities" simply because they post videos there (I know it's a bit of an extreme example, but it's the first thing that came to mind). Primefac (talk) 21:35, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Notability of YouTubers
[edit]I have started an essay on the notability of YouTubers within the YouTube WikiProject. I would appreciate peer review and comment with the intention of establishing consensus. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)