Category talk:Wikipedia sockpuppets of T-man, the Wise Scarecrow

Oh, come on, the meat puppet is ok, no problem there, not at all, its fair enough... actually I don't have a problem with the rest either, but featuring all IP addresses I've ever edited from... come on. At least three of those were only from times I edited without signing and the rest are clearly and intentionally tied to the other accounts without. Furthermore, including Talk pages? hahahah, That's just too thoroughly intending to make it seem like I have an empire of sockpuppets. I mean, whatever, it's fine if you guys keep it, but I want to point out that this exess of listing looks silly and that I'd obviously be grateful if you guys would be kind enough to retire whatever you consider to be redundant or thorough. Thanks beforehand. --T-man, the wise 07:18, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:200.112.96.113 is neither me at all nor anybody in range nor anybody connected to me. That one, I demand to take off. The checkUser result was "No proof available with CheckUser. —Matthew Brown (T:C) 12:42, 12 February 2006 (UTC)". Keeping it here would not only go against procedure but could constitute a proof of either ineptitude, negligence and/or bad faith.

User:201.114.107.204 doesn't hide he is User:The Judge, who is my cousing who lives with me, and therefore are the same meatpuppet that shouldn't be listed twice if they're not hiding connection.
User:201.114.96.112 and User:201 are the exact same sockpuppet without trying to hide connection.

--T-man, the wise 07:49, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since I'm sure I'm right (and just in consulted twice the policies), I took the liberty of removing the IP that Checkused determined that has nothing to do with me (EVEN BEFORE IT WAS INCLUDED IN THIS CATEGORY DAMMIT!!), and all the talkpages but 201 and The Judge. I'd be needing and admin to do so for me.--T-man, the wise 03:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]