Category talk:Wikipedia policies and guidelines
can someone
[edit]can someone tell me if we are allowed to delete previously created pages that are no longer up-to date? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wend.anaya (talk • contribs) 20:27, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Standardization
[edit]It appears that policy and guideline standards are nowhere near as clear-cut as I'd hoped. Much is needed and this tree, annotated with my first recommendations, only hints at the difficulty. The tree, of course, is itself not correctly sorted:
Wikipedia policies and guidelines (rename "Wikipedia pages about policies and guidelines")
- Wikipedia proposals (flag many as historical)
- Wikipedia proposals in brainstorming stage (delete, empty)
- Wikipedia proposals in experimental stage (delete, empty)
- Wikipedia rejected proposals (way overpopulated; add subcats roughly matching P&G breakdowns)
- Wikipedia guidelines (delete proposals)
- Wikipedia behavioral guidelines (delete proposals and add from COI)
- Conflict of interest (depopulate and delete)
- Wikipedia content guidelines (separate out style guidelines and make category clearer)
- Wikipedia editing guidelines (fix some sortkeys)
- Wikipedia naming conventions (separate out style guidelines)
- Wikipedia notability guidelines (delete proposals and make sure category is full)
- Wikipedia style guidelines (separate out naming conventions; create new category for MOS)
- General style guidelines (combine into style guidelines, and define what's MOS and not)
- Wikipedia behavioral guidelines (delete proposals and add from COI)
- Wikipedia official policy (exclude summaries; add subcats; put EVERY policy here and in 1 subcat)
- Wikipedia conduct policy (add sortkeys)
- Wikipedia content policy (add sortkeys)
- Wikipedia deletion policy (add sortkeys)
At a loss of where to start and even where to post this for proper community attention, I will merely make this an action note for now. I may return some time later. JJB 19:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC)