Category talk:Sex worker activists

	Human sexuality portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
	This category is supported by the Sex work task force.

Eliminating bias

Before a few days ago, this category contained activists who advocate for the rights of sex workers no matter whether those activists see prostitution as exploitative of sex workers or empowering of sex workers. Recently, however, all of the sex worker activists taking the former position were removed from this category and the explanation of the scope of the category was altered to specify the latter position. No matter who is right about prostitution, Wikipedia does not take sides. Activists who take both positions purport to be advocating for changes that will benefit sex workers and argue that those on the other side are actually advocating changes that will be detrimental to sex workers. In order for this category to remain neutral, activists on both sides of this debate should be included in this category; the articles that were removed should be reinstated and the explanation of the category's scope should be reverted to its previous form. Neelix (talk) 15:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By way of background, I believe this category used to be called "Sex worker rights activists", which by definition is a pro-decriminalization movement, and was at some point changed to a broader category "Sex worker activists". I'm not sure if I agree with that merger, but I'll let it stand for the moment. Even with that definition in place, that still includes only people who fall into two categories - 1) Sex worker rights activists, who are pro-decrim, 2) "Survivor" or "exited" sex worker activists, who often support prostitution abolition. What this category most certainly does not include is just anybody who happens to support a pro-decriminalization or pro-abolitionist position. In particular, Kajsa Wahlberg was extremely inappropriately placed in this category. Wahlberg was never a sex worker, is with the Swedish National Police, and happens to be a leading Swedish government advocate of their countries legislation. The idea that a police person in charge of enforcing laws against sex work is in some way a "sex worker activist" is abusing the term in the extreme. It's a bit like calling William Bennett a "marijuana activist". Iamcuriousblue (talk) 21:50, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Sex workers activists" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sex workers activists. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 18#Sex workers activists until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Sex worker activists" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sex worker activists. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 18#Sex worker activists until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]