Category talk:Royal mistresses

Merge

The Royal mistress consists of little more than dictdef and a list at the moment and I fail to see how it is likely to be expanded beyond. Better I think to simply have the dictdef as part of teh description of this category which can hold this list naturally. Caerwine 04:47, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. Royal mistress has references which would look odd in a category. Doing what you suggests would discourage article expansion, which I could envisage happening (not me though!) I can't see a reason to merge. -- Ian ≡ talk 09:53, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Whie I disagree with the proposition that it would discourage article expansion, I do see now where the possibility of expansion exists, so I shall withdraw the suggestion. Caerwine 15:30, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Should this article include partners who the king or prince in question later married? This would apply to some of Henry VIII's wives, I understand Prince Andrew and Fergie slept together quite openly during their engagement etc.. PatGallacher 10:56, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]