This category was nominated for deletion on 10 February 2011. The result of the discussion was no consensus to change to a consistent name format.
This category was nominated for renaming on 23 April 2012. The result of the discussion was Moved from Old Westminsters → People educated at Westminster School, London.
This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This category is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This category is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
And the several comments were addressed in the nomination, the discussion and the close. But by all means start another cfd (which is the way to move, ie rename, a category). Oculi (talk) 13:58, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Addressed? It was abruptly closed by an involved admin and with a passing comment claiming something without citing support in data or policy. I'm confused - your use of that word is not concordant with mine, or existing community norms. :-)
Ambiguous category names do not generally survive cfd, regardless of the article name. (This point is made by the nom, the closer and myself in the cfd, thus addressing the addition of the dab 'London'.) Oculi (talk) 18:33, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
So is this consensus of those who turn up (i.e., those who hang out on the Category meta-pages), or agreed policy that's documented policy? Because it's news to me. :-)