Category talk:Pages where expansion depth is exceeded
Appearance
This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]i came across this cat when researching Osteichthyes and found this diff automatically added this red cat by adding the {{automatic taxobox}}, and this cat is very full! so i wondered about its rationale, as surfing by cat is done by many (not just me), and red cats are to be avoided aren't they... very best, oscar (talk) 00:19, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Existing templates to be reviewed
[edit]See [1] starting VP/T#Templates_and_expansion_depth. Only since this category exists (and the newPP categorising feature), May 2012, a lot of pages have shown to have excessive depth. It appears these old end-editor templates are to be reviewed (suspect or known to be wrong):
{{atn}}
{{Automatic taxobox}}
{{Infobox_German_location}}
{{Infobox Theatre}}
{{Monthly clean up category}}
-
Doing...this Monthly one. -DePiep (talk) 06:30, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
(please expand this list below)
- -DePiep (talk) 06:15, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Probably won't be done, wait for Lua template revamping [2]. -DePiep (talk) 14:56, 23 August 2012 (UTC)