This category is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Backing down a bit from my comment. Actually looks like Category:New Zealand archaeologists is currently subcatted under historians and anthropologists. I stated it was the other way around. Makes more sense. So currently for example, Category:New Zealand people by occupation should be removed from Category:New Zealand archaeologists, per WP:SUBCAT. Still all this is assuming those are correct subcategorizations. Another way to do it is have all three: anthropologists, historians and archaeologists all in Category:New Zealand people by occupation, with no subcatting. --DB1729talk16:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They aren't correct, or at least they shouldn't be diffusing. Anthropology, history, and archaeology are overlapping but distinct fields. – Joe (talk) 07:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
