Is anyone here experienced with infoboxes? I'm considering porting information in the "fact sheets" to a table but thought I'd see if there's anybody with infobox/table experience first. - Diceman13:55, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
This is what I've come up with using the Infobox Arcade Game template but I'm having a hard time deciding if an arid or a green colour should be used for all of them. Perhaps either could be used depending on the park's climate. - Diceman16:18, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
Looks good. Stick with one colour for them all - I think I prefer the green, but don't mind much. Is there a word or phrase to describe each IUCN category that could be added to the number and wikilinked (such as national park)? I notice the IUCN page doesn't link the names, and the national park page doesn't seem to mention IUCN :-( --Scott DavisTalk13:05, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
I like the dirt colour but the green is easier to look at. Most of the parks are probably in wetter areas anyway so green it is. - Diceman15:25, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
The shade of green is reminiscent of eucalyptus to me, which represents Australian National Parks to the world. If you're going to standardise all the Australian parks, you get to choose :-) Well done. --Scott DavisTalk01:42, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
I was unaware there had been a "prior infobox". I don't think it had been on any of the national parks I had looked at (particularly South Australia). As the person who said above to stick with one colour, I meant not to try to represent climate. I am happy to colour-code by status - especially as part of a world scheme. I was also unaware of that wikiproject. Thankyou for your information. Do they otherwise contain the same information? --Scott DavisTalk11:21, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
