Category talk:Magistri equitum (Roman Republic)

This category was nominated for deletion on 30 October 2009. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome

Military history: Biography / Roman & Byzantine Category‑class

This category is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Magister Equitums is grammatically incorrect

Since I don't have administrative privileges and can't change a category name, I spent two weeks trying to get this grammatical error corrected — in vain. The plural of magister equitum is magistri equitum. To form the plural as magistri equitums is as illiterate as forming the plural of "the right of women" as "the right of womens." It disappoints me that the Wikipedia apparatus has become so cumbersome that a grammatical error can't be corrected. The category should be renamed "Category:Masters of the Horse in ancient Rome." Cynwolfe (talk) 13:17, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Preceding discussion relates to category under prior title

Per CFD, this category was renamed from Category:Roman magistri equitum. postdlf (talk) 18:59, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A small correction. This category was in fact renamed from the barbaric Category:Roman Magister Equitums. (Category:Roman magistri equitum was an alternative preferred by some of us.) Wareh (talk) 19:12, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]