Category talk:Literature stubs

Untitled

The entries under T should NOT include the definite article ("the")-18 September 2005

This is because of the way the {{lit-stub}} tag is formatted. It is unfortunate yet unavoidable. -- Francs 2000

11:24, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So what is to be done with all the stubs with 'the' currently under the T section? Also, it seems there are a number of devotional/religious oriented books. Is the number great enough to warrant a Religion-book-stub or Rel-book-stub category? --JECompton 05:23, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vs. Book stubs

There seems to be quite a bit of overlap between this category and Category:Book stubs. And Book stubs appears to have been expanded to include a number of sub-categories. I've already had a number of articles using lit-stub be changed to book-stub. Is there any point to having this category of stub anymore? 23skidoo 12:39, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Besides serviving as a parent stub type, there are also subtopics other than books that haven't yet garnered enough stubs for a category of their own. Caerwine 21:56, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Next stub split?

I don't think we need one right now, but there's a discussion over at WP:SFD over {{India-lit-stub}}, {{Tamil-lit-stub}} and {{Classical Tamil-stub}}. Until now literature stubs have been split by genre or format (book, story, etc.); should we start looking at splitting it by region, country, nationality? Cheers, Her Pegship (tis herself) 22:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]