Category talk:Linguists by nationality

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles

WikiProject Countries to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Check out the article alerts; see if anything catches your fancy.
Cleanup : clean-up listing for Countries
Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stubs by region.
Other : add {{WPCountries}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess.

Linguistics

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This category is supported by the science and academia work group.

comments

Net Koene (dutch linguist) should be placed at K and not at N Amdewaard (talk) 16:31, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible change of some subcategories

Dear fellows. I have been going through this Category:Linguists by nationality and I see some problems. So far, it contains 86 categories, of which 82 refer to specific countries. But it is quite "uneven": some appear by their country name (e.g. "Category:Linguists from England") and others appear by their denomyn adjective (e.g. "Category:Egyptian linguists"). I think it would be good to find one single criteria for all and move the "wrong" categories accordingly. What do you say? Regards, --Fabio Descalzi, aka Fadesga (talk) 14:12, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This was because of consensus at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_November_13#Linguists_by_nationality to use "Linguists from Foo" in cases where "Fooian" was also the name of a language, to avoid ambiguity.

Support was expressed for also renaming the others such as Egyptian, for consistency. Later BrownHairedGirl (talk · contribs) did so in 2018.[1]

Sorry, @Oculi:, I did not notice your recent Speedy nominations which have now been processed, contrary to the consensus at full CFD linked above. Would you mind if I summarily reverse the speedy renames, or would you prefer to take them to a fresh discussion? – Fayenatic London 21:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Those speedies do seem to have been an error, so it was right to revert them.

I know that @Oculi is an experienced and conscientious editor of categories, so I am sure that this was a good faith oversight. I think I can guess how it happened: that the sample which Oculi checked had been created after the 2012 CFD, so their page histories showed no link to that CFD. May I suggest to @Fayenatic london that some note about that CFD be left on the category talk pages and/or in the edit summary of a dummy edit to the category pages? That would make it easier to avoid such tangles in future. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:17, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Oculi has been following up a nomination of mine and renaming a few rare hierarchies in the form "X people from Foo" to "Fooian X people". I acknowledge that those Linguists cats which were renamed speedily in 2018 had no link to the 2012 CFD in their page history. However, they do now [2] – I listed them under that CFD when I reversed the latest renaming. – Fayenatic London 09:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good work @Fayenatic london. You were ahead of me. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:14, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have also added a note on this parent category page. – Fayenatic London 23:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have now reversed the Speedy nominations and relisted the set under Opposed on the Speedy page. – Fayenatic London 16:24, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]