This category is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Although it is generally the case that categories follow the name of the article on the same topic, it does not necessarily apply if the name is ambiguous, even if the topic is the primary topic. For example, article Dover but Category:Dover, Kent (discussed here), and article Plymouth but Category:Plymouth, Devon. Here we have the reverse situation - and I suspect that the present category title would not survive WP:CFD. (Though arguably Lancaster, England would be a better title for the article, following the current WP:UKPLACE.)
Apart from the complication of there being other cities of Lancaster, the category title "City of.." seems to me to be ambiguous where the word "city" is commonly used to refer to the settlement (e.g. in several places in the article on Lancaster). Even the Lancaster City Council's own website uses "Lancaster district" to refer to the district as opposed to the settlement (e.g. here).--Mhockey (talk) 21:08, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]