Category talk:LGBTQ-related mass media stubs

This category is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles

LGBTQ+ studies

This category is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Media

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Move to LGBTQ

@HouseBlaster: the Speedy move of this one seems premature, as Category:LGBT-related mass media has not been moved yet. Will that set be moved as a matter of course? if not, I suggest we summarily revert this one. – Fayenatic London 20:16, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had been making my way through the list of LGBT categories following Talk:LGBTQ#Requested move 14 August 2024, but I stopped now that the move is at being reviewed at Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2024 September#LGBTQ. I would not strongly object to reverting all of the LGBT(Q) moves, though consensus seems to favor the move and therefore I question whether reverting the move just creates more work in the future. House Blaster (talk • he/they) 20:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK then, I'll leave it, and let you carry on when that's closed.

Please note that the links and descriptions in the category pages will want updating too. – Fayenatic London 09:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]