Category talk:LGBTQ-related films

This category was nominated for renaming on 1 September 2019. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

LGBTQ+ studies

This category is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

subcategories

gold star. whomever did Lesbianism-related and Bisexuality-related is clearly an annoying person of the first class. and what of gay-related? a stunning ommission. anyone care to fix this crap? sorry, but i'm busy changing Category:African American films to Category:films marked by their similarities to the experience of americans of african extraction — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.162.165.194 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

categorytree

I put <categorytree>Category:LGBT-related films</categorytree> on the front page, because we have categories that extend onto later pages. Another editor removed it; I thought I'd open up discussion here. To my mind, it is problematic to have major subdivisions (e.g., Lesbian-related films) hidden on subsequent pages. What is the disadvantage of having categorytree? --Lquilter (talk) 19:05, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IMO, and it's just an opinion, categorytree duplicates the subcategories already listed. I see what you mean, though - since the cat has so many members, the "L" subcat doesn't show up until page 2 or later. I would suggest we move "Lesbian-related films", "Bisexuality-related films" and "Transgender in film" to the very first area, where "LGBT-related films by country" is right now. That would help keep those three cats visible, no? -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 21:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Categorytree is duplicative, but it's the only way I'm aware of to get categories to show up when the page goes >200 entries. I gathered several of the categories together in a national subgrouping which I sorted to the top, per Wikipedia catsorting standards. It seems artificial to gather together some sections and not others. Can we do the production companies together, e.g., Category:LGBT-related films by production company? And then we could also do Category:LGBT-related films by sexuality, including lesbian & trans ... but then we need a Category:Gay male related films, no? --Lquilter (talk) 16:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want those particular categories to show up on further pages? And if you do, why not add:

Category tree is just so *big* - not that I have anything against big, mind you :) But it does take up so much room on the page, and duplicates the entries. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 18:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"See also" isn't usually used for subcategories; it's usually used for related categories that don't work within a tree configuration. ... I don't want any particular subcategories to show up on the first page; I want all subcategories to show up. It's completely non-intuitive to people that categories go to the next page -- that's why categorytree was created. See Wikipedia:Magic_words and http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:CategoryTree . --Lquilter (talk) 18:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's totally counterintuitive to me to include categorytree on a category page, for the reasons I mentioned. But if you re-add, I'll leave it alone. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 19:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should Category:Gay porn films be a subcategory of Category:LGBT-related films?

Apokrif (talk) 03:47, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Works

@*Treker: regarding this edit, please note that Category:Works in Wikipedia consists of much more than scholarly works only, see e.g. Category:Works by medium. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:55, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's bad. Then it just becomes a duplicate of Category:LGBT portrayals in mass media. It's unhelpful and shouldn't be how it's done.★Trekker (talk) 11:43, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]