Category talk:Japanese dam stubs

This category is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles

Japan

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 20:23, November 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Dams

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Dams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DamsWikipedia:WikiProject DamsTemplate:WikiProject DamsDam articles

Untitled

Many of these stubs need more text and third-party references to establish notability. A stub such as Kawabe Dam has very little information and just does not seem adequate for a WP article. Maybe what is needed is a List of dams in Japan, rather than a separate article for each dam. Johnfos (talk) 07:32, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, Yes they all need a lot of work undoubtedly and references but actually there is enough information in Japanese to constitute seperate articles. There may however by one or two which have lesser significance but I'm sure these can be spotted easily. Actually the Kawabe Dam which you described as inadequate as a lot of web sources in english see google search. I am willing to bet that 99% of these stubs are notable and can also be expanded substantially. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 13:06, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stub sorting - sub-categories - some statistics

I've reviewed all of the A-articles and come up with the statistics shown in the sub-sections below. I'm thinking that Prefecture-level sub-cats might be too small. For Islands other than the main island, though, creating sub-cats for these might be useful. Completion decade might also be a practicable sub-sorting dimension; might create sub-cats for non-Honshu islands and completion-decade cats for Honshu island dams. Thoughts? --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:55, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Prefectures

Aichi - x
Akita - xxx
Aomori - xxx
Chiba - xxxx
Ehime - x
Fukui - x
Fukushima - x
Gifu - xxxx
Gunma - x
Hiroshima - xx
Hokkaido - xxxxx xx
Hyogo - xxxx
Ishikawa - x
Iwate - xxx
Kagawa - x
Kagoshima - x
Kochi - xx
Kumamoto - xx
Mie - x
Miyagi - xxxxx x
Miyazaki - xx
Niigata - xx
Nagano - xxx
Okayama - x
Okinawa - xx
Saga - xxx
Shiga - x
Shimane - xx
Tochigi - x
Tokyo - x
Tottori - x
Toyama - x
Yamagata - xxx
Yamaguchi - xxxxx x
Yamanashi - xx

Islands

Hokkaido - xxxxx xx
Honshu - xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxx
Kyushu - xxxxx xx
Okinawa - xx
Ryukuu - x
Shikoku - xxxx

Completion decade

1880s - x
1910s - x
1930s - xxxxx xx
1940s - xxxxx x
1950s - xxxxx xx
1960s - xxxxx xxxx
1970s - xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx x
1980s - xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxx
1990s - xxxxx x
2000s - xxxx
2010s - xx
not specified - xxx

User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:55, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stub sorting - sub-categories - using PetScan

Link to PetScan: https://petscan.wmflabs.org/

Kyushu

Looking at Kyushu Island, there are seven prefectures: Fukuoka, Kagoshima, Kumamoto, Miyazaki, Nagasaki, Oita and Saga. Using Intersection searches between "Japanese dam stubs" and each prefecture category (depth 10) turned up:

"Saga Prefecture" intersection --> 37 articles
"Fukuoka Prefecture" intersection --> 61 articles
"Kagoshima Prefecture" intersection --> 35 articles
"Kumamoto Prefecture" intersection --> 30 articles
"Miyazaki Prefecture" intersection --> 46 articles
"Nagasaki Prefecture" intersection --> 0 articles, which I think is not correct
"Ōita Prefecture" intersection --> 11 articles

Total articles: 37 + 61 + 35 + 30 + 46 + 11 = 220. This is above the standard minimum threshold for stub template + category creation.

--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:54, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hokkaido

This has a single prefecture, Hokkaido Prefecture; intersection of "Hokkaido" and "Japanese dam stubs" categories returns 168 articles.

--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shikoku

Intersection of "Shikoku region" and "Japanese dam stubs" categories returns 149 articles.

--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:03, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Honshu regions

Intersections with "Japanese dam stubs"...

"Tōhoku region", 241 articles
"Kantō region", 136 articles
"Chūbu region", 344 articles
"Kansai region", 170 articles
"Chūgoku region", 200 articles

Impact

Creation of stub templates + categories for each of the intersections noted above would allow sub-cat sorting of 1,628 articles ... which exceeds the approximate count of the origin stub category currently counted at 1,598. No doubt there are some errors in the calculations / estimates, but the point is that the creations would effectively whittle "Japanese dam stubs" down to a small sub-cat sorting category. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:18, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]